English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I think it is a very sad song that should not be sang on New Years.

2006-12-31 08:05:11 · 7 answers · asked by trisha_is_bored 2 in Society & Culture Holidays Other - Holidays

7 answers

The Romans named January after Janus, a god with two faces looking backward and forward. In Auld Lang Syne, we have a remembrance of things past, with a realisation they are past because we are moving forward, so in that way, it is very suitable.

Plus, it helps if you are pissed - and Scottish

2006-12-31 08:08:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

trish: Personally, I do not like the melody ! I saw a cartoon, and it had a scene where the vinyl record playing the Auld Lang Syne dirge, on the juke-box was rectangular in shape (instead of rounded) ... giving the melody its dirge-like tune. Maybe this explains it !!! Anyways; Happy 2007 !!!

2006-12-31 16:16:10 · answer #2 · answered by guraqt2me 7 · 0 0

Only slightly, there's a bitter sweet feeling I get when I hear it. Like sadness that a year is gone but happy a new one is starting over:)

2006-12-31 16:08:30 · answer #3 · answered by Ann 3 · 1 0

It is a little bitter sweet. It mostly reminds me of certain movies that I have seen it in, such as It's a Wonderful Life.

2006-12-31 16:25:45 · answer #4 · answered by Holy Macaroni! 6 · 0 0

No, It doesn't depress me at all. It reminds us not to forget where we come from.

Admittedly a high order for todays generation who seem to have the attention span of a retarded gnat, but there you are.

2006-12-31 16:15:59 · answer #5 · answered by Flash MacTavish 2 · 0 0

a little bit.
it sounds like a sad song
especially when played slow

2006-12-31 16:06:45 · answer #6 · answered by turned 18 "whoooo!!!!!" 2 · 0 0

Its not a sad song, doesnt sound sad atall to me.

2006-12-31 16:09:24 · answer #7 · answered by 132 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers