If something you truly believed in or even love were suddenly made to be false or evil or a lie would you want to believe it? Let me give you an example.
Lets say that you believe in God many people do and many people don't but that doesn't matter. And lets also ignore the fact that the existence of God can not proved nor disproved. Lets just go on the premise that you believe God exists and that he is as real as the nose on your face. You have gone your entire existence believing in God. Now lets say someone has proved without any doubt that God did not ever exist and that everything that you have ever been told or believed about God was a lie. Would you believe the truth even though you didn't want to? Or would you simply dismiss this proof as if it weren't there?
This merely an analogy I am not trying prove anything here so you religious people just chill, atheists too. My point here is that it is human nature to ignore the truth if it doesn't fit in with you ideology of life.
2006-12-31 08:10:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by ikeman32 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
241 pieces of evidence? Wow! Where are they? Where did you get them from? Loose Change? MySpace? YouTube? There is not a single 9/11 conspiracy theory that I find remotely plausible.
* The gov't shot down United 93. – That claim has been debunked so many times that repeating it only soils the memory of the heroes of the flight.
* The gov't was behind the attacks. – There are so many things wrong with this I don't know where to start. First, what possible reason would the US gov't have to kill 3000 of its own? Second, Bush is nowhere near smart enough to arrange it. Third, it would require so many agencies of the gov't working together that that alone makes it impossible, much less keeping it secret. Fifth, if 9/11 was an inside job, and the gov’t would have no qualms killing 3000 of its own to start a war, it wouldn’t hesitate to kill the conspiracy theorists. Besides, doesn't the fact that Osama admitted to it mean anything to you?
* The FDNY was ordered to implode the building. – Okay, the FDNY lost 343 good men and women because they were busy planting explosives with such perfect precision that the building imploded straight down. Does that make sense to anyone?
* The Zionists/Mossad/Israel was behind the attacks. 4000 Jews stayed home from work. – First, this was started by Hezbollah, which, before 9/11, led all terrorist orgs in number of Americans killed. Second, many Jews were among the dead and injured. I guess they missed the email. Third, many Christians and Muslims and others took the day off or were late. Did they get the email instead of the Jews? Or was it that 9/11/01 was primary day in New York State and some people of all religious backgrounds needed to work on campaigns that day.
* Mossad knew about the attacks beforehand. – This is true. Mossad, MI6, the CIA and FBI, and other intelligence agencies worldwide all knew something was going to happen. Unfortunately, no one knew what, when, how, where, or by whom.
2006-12-31 17:49:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
There is no proof, no smoking gun that 911 was an inside job. Not even credible evidence. Some questions. If the WTC was brought down by controlled demolition, why were planes used? And if demolition was used, why was it 'controlled'? How would the government wire a building bottom to top with explosives without anyone noticing? And why would the government base a plan on a 40 year old declassified document that was rejected in its own time? No part of the inside job theory seems logical, practical, or even doable.
2006-12-31 17:46:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
If you really believe you have evidence and verifiable facts that point to 9/11 being an inside job then it should be fairly easy to present your evidence - the media would do nicely for that - and Congress will take it from there. Why hasn't that happened? Why has all this so-called "evidence" been discounted, especially by those who hate Bush and this entire Administration? You know they are digging like mad to find anything to use against him, so why haven't they used it if it is indeed proof positive? Why can none of you who tout this conspiracy get anyone legimate to speak out about it? Never mind, the rest of us already know why.
2006-12-31 15:59:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
There is no evidence about 911 being inside, we all KNOW what happened in 911, I was a officer during that time and was there when FBI was questioning people who knew some of the terrorist, Terroist did it, no one could possibly beleive anything else,and in the end, you do a serious injustice ato the family of people who died in the air planes the terrorist used.
Look the husband or wife of a victim on those planes and tell them the planes did not actualy hit the pentagon or the towers, and see if you don't get spit in the face
2006-12-31 15:50:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
i am semi guilty of that, i have been wrestling with this since i first found out some weeks ago,i seem to have made a mistake i was very pro allies till this info came out, it has been prophesied in the good book about hitting ones self on the head with ones own axe, ithought it was refering to suicide bombers, but it looks like it was refering to the allies'
2006-12-31 15:54:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by trucker 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Putting together some theories does not constitute evidence.
2006-12-31 15:50:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by mstrywmn 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's all complicated in a way. Alot of people rather believe a lie rather than the truth.
2006-12-31 15:51:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by Portia P 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Just take a look at my questions,,,I do know what your saying here!!
2006-12-31 18:46:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by Bush 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
nut job
2006-12-31 16:13:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by god 1
·
0⤊
0⤋