2006-12-31 07:27:04 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Do it please michelle, all I need is to read more lies.
2006-12-31 07:29:12 · update #1
Bush is almost more of a Liberal than what Clinton was! Libs can't figure that out
EDIT- And I'm quite proud to be part of the 30% that thinks like you ah ha!
How does dstr feel about being part of the 1% that believes Bush blew up the WTC??
LMAO..Why does dstr always type complete BS then cut and run from it???
2006-12-31 07:30:34 · answer #1 · answered by BAARAAACK 5 · 6⤊ 6⤋
No, he's had many. Even many conservatives can point them out.
Ya know jeanne, looking back at all of your retarded questions and answers through out the weeks....I wonder...hmmmmm
Can you even give us a correct definition of the term "liberal"?
You sure do use it often as a blanket word to describe a pretty expansive lot.
Oh yeah...and your grammar REALLY SUCKS. Guess you could blame that on the socialist inspired, leftist public school system.
2006-12-31 09:57:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It’s noted as an Alinsky even as imaginitive Liberal Socialist Democrats; lie, libel, slander, defame to smear warring parties of Socialism as foretold in guidelines for Radicals by Saul Alinsky. Immoral Alinsky habit proves that imaginitive Liberal Socialist Democrat philosophy is evil & amoral resembling that of psychotics or serial killers i.e. psychopaths for the 'more suitable strong' of Socialism.
2016-12-01 09:10:26 · answer #3 · answered by fuents 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
if you means with style and class,yes he has taken a very good approach and who knows,maybe after hes dead the media will praise him too,I mean after all they basically castrted Ford during his Presidency and now he was the right man for the right time(actually true) but during his reign he was Satan,Public enemy #1 also
2006-12-31 07:32:03 · answer #4 · answered by stygianwolfe 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
no doubt,he could have pressed charges against the clintons for trashing white house and didnt,he could have hung sandy berger for stealing archive documents and didnt,how many more times is Bush going to turn his back on the libs and let them get away with things that they would hang the Bush administration for.
2006-12-31 07:42:55 · answer #5 · answered by rosierotnass 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yes he is nice, but when it comes down to it he'll always stand up for what he believes is right.
2006-12-31 07:58:06 · answer #6 · answered by JudiBug 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, I remember early in his 1st term, how he wanted to set a "new tone". This was met with nothing but derision and back stabbing by the liberals. He continued reaching out to them throughout his presidency. I would have liked to see him being a little more dirty and cut-throat, politically speaking. Treat them the way they treated him.
2006-12-31 07:35:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
No, we didn't carpet bomb Baghdad. Nor was an assassination launched on Rosie O' Donell.
P.S. By the way, Michell, you are a a very special kind of stupid.
2006-12-31 07:29:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 1⤋
It's not a matter of being nice. I just wish he was more conservative. I think he's simply not all that conservative, which makes it more perplexing why liberals hate him so much. It seems like hate, just for the sake of hate.
2006-12-31 07:44:10 · answer #9 · answered by FrederickS 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
NO! Being nice to liberals has been a character strength. He is a better man than I am!
2006-12-31 07:35:51 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋