Why mess up one Country when you can mess up lots
2006-12-31 06:53:54 · 35 answers · asked by The Questioner 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
hopefully none ,but realistically, the usa has become used to shedding blood here and there for no real reason but feeding their own pride , strengthening their authority and serving their selfish petty needs ,actually, i think it should invade itself under the pretext of world terrorism, mass destruction, and being source of constant violence and fear. it has proved that it can not live peacefully with the other no matter who to the extent that some of the answerers want usa to invade france ,only for disliking the french. How disgusting become human beings when their petty desires look huge before their eyes!!!
2006-12-31 07:23:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
i imagine you'll locate that in international places the U. S. and (regrettably) the united kingdom invade/ unencumber (searching on who you hear to) that's not the British style of democracy it truly is imposed, that's the yankee form. note, the U. S. basically insists democracy is solid in international places the position all or any of right here criteria are filled. One. The united states of america is a suspected haven for terrorists. 2. The united states of america openly dislikes the U. S.. 3. The united states of america has oil and is administered through a dictator or similar unelected chief. Please also note, if circumstances one and three are satisfied, the U. S. will proceed to be pleasant see you later as oil and palms bargains proceed to bypass. Did I hear besides whisper 'Saudi Arabia?' No? ought to easily be my own jaded view human beings overseas coverage. that's about time someone severe up in both the U. S. and uk governments realised that democracy isn't the right authorities sort for each and each and every united states of america.
2016-10-16 22:37:14 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hopefully no countries...
It would probably be the U.S. invading more than the U.K...
I dont think we need to invade anymore countries and mess up peoples lives.
2006-12-31 07:00:02 · answer #3 · answered by Jenny 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hopefully Tony Blair won't invade any other country - he'll put our tax money to better use and concentrate on sorting out the ******* mess this one is in.
2007-01-01 05:33:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I do not expect UK to invade anywhere again, but the Yanks are the loose cannon in the world at present so who can say. it may be the UK for not supporting them is some other World domination ploy.
2007-01-01 18:21:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm going for Belgium. The S A S and the Green Berets against Claude Van Damme and Tintin???...no competition!!!
2006-12-31 06:57:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Gabon is nice. They have a few Soviet era T54 tanks and no spare parts. 3 fishing boats with guns mounted for navy and A boeing 747 (Needs parts) - Airforce. And A big diamond mine. Oh, and a DICTATOR as well!
2006-12-31 08:45:41 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm pretty sure that if Bush decides to go into Iran or anywhere else, he'll be on his own.
In fact that's a great idea, he can go personally to tell Iran why it's OK for us to have nukes but not them. Oh, I forgot, he's not a military man, is he?
2006-12-31 06:56:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
France..hopefully
2007-01-01 03:46:57 · answer #9 · answered by knowitall 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mars
2006-12-31 07:03:24 · answer #10 · answered by Ruby 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋