English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-12-31 06:35:56 · 3 answers · asked by jc_chapin 1 in Entertainment & Music Movies

3 answers

A made-up historically inaccurate one. Still, a cool movie.
"On a very basic level, the movie contains a number of items unknown in precolumbian Mesoamerica, such as metal javelin blades. The Maya city inaccurately combines details from different Maya and Mesoamerican cultures widely separated by time and place.[2] For example, temples are in the shape of those of Tikal in the central lowlands classic style while decorated with Puuc style elements of the north west Yucatan centuries later. The mural in the arched walkway includes elements from the Maya codices combined with elements from the Bonampak murals (over 700 years older than the film's setting) and the San Bartolo murals (some 1500 years older than the film's setting)-- as in most civilizations, the styles of Maya art changed dramatically over the centuries. Elements of such non-Maya civilizations as those of Teotihuacan and the Aztec are also seen."

2006-12-31 11:39:19 · answer #1 · answered by Gevera Bert 6 · 0 0

think it was sets. check out http://sg.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20061216101256AAL0erR also see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apocalypto

"The footage floats from the jungles of Catemaco to the City of Veracruz, offering an excellent look at the southeastern state" ~ http://www.visitmexicopress.com/press_release02.asp?pressID=196

2006-12-31 14:51:56 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Don't know but it was a good movie.

2006-12-31 14:49:37 · answer #3 · answered by N8t!^3 B@ll@ 3 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers