Are white people behind the most worst genocides in history?

Question

It seems as if white europeans have a strange tendancy to exterminate anyone that is different to them. I have a list of atrocities that europeans have appeared to be behind.

The Spanish Conquest of South America - millions of natives wiped out.

The Spanish Inquisition - 300,000 non-xians exterminated.

Europeans colonise america - 50 million native americans wiped out. http://hnn.us/articles/7302.html

The Crusades - 200 years of warfare waged on middle east resulting in deaths of countless millions

Vietnam War - 2 - 4 million vietnamese killed.

Hiroshima - 250,000 japanese civilians wiped out by American forces.

Killing and suppression under the british empire of natives to India, Africa and so forth.

Answer 1

yea basically. Im white and i think white people are the stupidest things alive.

Answer 2

The worst mark would be trying to decide which was worse. Slavery and genocide are both bad marks on White America. One is just as bad as the other.

Answer 3

Probably not, but you have a point. However, if you think in terms of "percentage of mankind wiped out" for historical genocides, the worst doubtless happened long before the so-called 'civilized' era, with large tribes of hairy brownish people wiping out other large tribes of hairy brownish people on what has today become the continent of Africa and the Middle East...

Answer 4

Yes, but don't forget the Ottoman Empire's responsibility for the Armenian Massacres and Hussein's massacres of Kurds. Also, the Japanese invaded Manchuria and killed and imprisoned a lot of people and the Chinese persecute people in Tibet. I don't dispute the history but we need to deal with racism, persecution, violence and other forms of hate across the board.

Answer 5

you seem to pull "millions" out of thin air....

while you have some points, you forget that american indians ( i do not believe 50 million) were ready to kill the settlers out west, savage, barbaric muslims had invaded the holy land, killing multitudes of people and destroying the land, the south vietnamese had been invaded by the communistic north vietnamese and were being tortured, so the americans tried to help, the japanese were the ones to drop a bomb on pearl harbor, starting the war, and killed alot of people themselves, and that black people in africa sold their own into slavery.....

Answer 6

How about Darfur, or any genocides on the continent of africa? How about the rape of china in world war 2 by japan. Arabs were involved in the crusades too, actually they controlled jerusalem for awhile if you want to get the facts straight. Spaniards are not considered "white" in the caucasian sense of the word, and actually persecuted WHITE JEWS in the inquisition. So suddenly your theory is NONSENSE.

Answer 7

by the millions ~ but it is in the past ~ Humans are now wiser

If people don't realize the "millions", they need first look up the history of the United States of America...

Answer 8

And now we have Darfur, Afghanistan, the world trade centre. Don't just go blaming the white people. And thecrusades were in response to the arabs killing off thousands of Christians in the Holy land, by the way. Why does nobody ever mention THAT? Muslim Arabs have caused more deaths throughout the past 1500 years than any other people, including the nazis

Answer 9

Where was the white man when the Tsusis tried to
wipe out the Hutus in Rhawanda?
Where is the white man in Sudan, where Muslims kill
black Christians and enslave them?
Where is Cracker in the ghetto where black gangs
murder each other over turf?
Eat SH1T and die Hater!

Answer 10

First of all the Spanish are not caucasian.

Second of all the crusades were in response to islamist territorial expansion. The middle east was primarily Christian BEFORE being Islamic.

Third: Vietnam was a war, not genocide. We had losses on our side as well.

Fourth: Japan attacked us first and we kept telling them to cease. It took nothing less then TWO atomic bombs to stop them. In case you forgot they still continued hostilities after the first dropping. Fanatics only understand violence unfortunatly.

But I do agree (being part Cherokee myself) that the killing of indians was wrong. And what the british empire did was wrong as well. But they have changed since then, being less imperial and more of a republic.

Your question is inherently ignorant and most of it is based on false assumptions. Read more books before making yourself look like a racist jerk.