Nope .... those f*ckers have no right to end a life.... they shouldve sentensed him in a political prison where all the political activists are kept.
2006-12-31 06:34:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
9⤊
4⤋
No Way.The Men Who Should Be Hanged Are Those War Monger,Butchers & Losers Named George W. Bush & Tony Blair.What Saddam Had Done,He Did In His Own Country.And America & The Other Fuckers Had Absolutely No Right To Manipulate The Verdict & Commence The Hanging So Early.No One Has The Right To Take A Man's Life.Those Are The People Who Created Al-Qaida & Many Other Threats To The Humanity.Can You Count How Many Lives They Have Taken?In How Many Country They Have Fueled A Internal War?
Above All, Saddam Is Resting Is Peace Now.And I Assure You That No Bad Deed Will Go Unpunished.If They Wish To Do It The Violent Way?So Be It.
2006-12-31 08:06:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by The Mad Devil 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
I do but I don't. On one hand, there's that old saying, "You live by the sword, you die by the sword." Saddam's regime tortured and killed thousands of people in worse ways than hanging. So, with that in mind, he got off pretty easy I'd say. Maybe they should have let the families of people he's killed have at him.
On the other hand, violence is never solved by more violence. Murder is murder, and by hanging someone, even the likes of Saddam, I think that lowers "the good side" down to his level.
In any event, it's over nad done with, and things happened exactly as they were designed to.
2006-12-31 06:48:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Don't know much about it but the thing is that US was in a hurry to hang saddam coz he was turning 70 on the 28 of April' 07 & as per the US LAW is concere no man or women will be given death penlty if his/her age is 70 or above..there was also a case trail left pending they should have cleared up all the cases first...iraq is the worlds most unsafe city as almost 3000 innocent people are killed EVERYDAY..till now approx 6.4 millon people have died since march 20, 2003 (us started war on iraq) all just to kill one GUY....
2006-12-31 07:41:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ray Of Light 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
It is said that he was brutal against humanity. If this is so then he should be held accountable for his deeds. But how? Like one colleague said 'keeping him in an American prison would have been the worst thing for him'. Therefore killing him had no effect on a person who believes in martyrdom. I don't think hanging him was the answer, especially if hanging him will not make the world a safer place.
2006-12-31 08:30:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by jabba 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
we've no tackle it. Saddam became a president in his us of a, Irak, and so that is barely easy that his destiny is desperate by technique of people who he brought about a lot suffering to. enable's not ignore, he's killed hundreds of hundreds of people.... it might desire to look very barbaric and an ''historical'' way of eliminating somebody, yet on the different hand, if Iraq's superb courtroom desperate to make this determination, they have each and all of the justifications interior the international to get this previous dictator to get hanged, do not you think of? in spite of if he might stay in detention center perpetually, it may be granting him of challenge to stay, to respire the comparable air as every person else, to stroll on the comparable international, to consume/to sleep.... In my eyes, he's lost all of those rights some years in the past, and so i can't watch for the day that the Iraqi's will see Saddam's ineffective physique. What a invaluable satisfaction on their area. of direction i would be happy too, yet i don't even have the slighest theory of ways a lot they suffered, i don't even think of that is defined in words.
2016-12-15 12:28:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, we know that SADDAM is not good person due to some fat but still hanging is not the solution he should be jailed for life in fact after hanging condition of Iraq will be more bad . It should be solved by peaceful way. But now its late
2006-12-31 07:13:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
NO,i think he is not the biggest threat to the world.
i think GEORGE BUSH is the real threat to the world, he divided the world and made it more unsafe place to live.bush should have been hanged he killed more people than saddam in the name of war
2006-12-31 10:17:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by raj 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
No, I do not. No matter how awful a person's deeds are, other people have no right to take away his life. If you are Christian, remember the biblical "rod in your own eye"? Of course the legal system should be allowed to function, he should be held accountable. However, a line is crossed when it is capital punishment. He killed many people, yes, but why should we kill him? That is just one more death, another life gone.
2006-12-31 06:47:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by lauren f 1
·
3⤊
0⤋
Nope, as whatever Saddam does, he does for his nation and I think b'coz of him only today Iraq is one of the great country as before him i.e. before 1982 there is no respect for Iraq at all(as much I know)... but he made his country great by his efforts and it is not at all easy to made any country great... so I think so before Saddam, Bush should be hanged.
2006-12-31 06:57:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by Puneet 1
·
3⤊
1⤋
Ok this is gonna be a touchy thing, but no i do not, however i do believe that he should have been put to death in a different way if that was what they were going to do, i do not believe in the death penalty personally, i'd have been fine if they put him in jail for the rest of his life, in America, that would have been the worse thing for HIM. And this is MY opinion and i'm not telling anyone else to believe it.
2006-12-31 06:42:33
·
answer #11
·
answered by sarah 5
·
4⤊
0⤋