When we are all honest with ourselves we know who is good and who is in it for themselves.
If you can't be honest you are lost and useless.
No one died when clinton lied! Bull!
The dems always have catchy one liners, shallow but catchy, a good hook for impressionable youths easily swayed and good for a vote.
But how do you explaine adults who supported clinton throught thick and thin and agreed with all he did then, but today they like the position that there never was any WMDs just to say something bad about the Bush Administration.
It is their filp flopping, John Kerry like, unwillingness to make and take a stand that exposes them as the irrational party members that they are.
The nonsensical issues that sway people astound me, Kerry & Edwards touted they had the best hair, and don't think for a minute that there were not people out there whos vote was based on looks. God help us if Fabio and Anna Nicole Smith run because the clinton supporters would not know who to nominate!
2006-12-31 04:55:38 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
After the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, which killed six and
injured
1,000; President Clinton promised that those responsible would be
hunted
down and punished.
After the 1995 bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed five U.S.
military
personnel; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down
and
punished.
After the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed
19 and
injured 200 U.S. military personnel; Clinton promised that those
responsible
would be hunted down and punished.
After the 1998 bombing of U.S. embassies in Africa, which killed 224
and
injured 5,000; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted
down
and punished.
After the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole, which killed 17 and injured
39
U.S. sailors; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted
down
and punished.
Maybe if Clinton had kept his promise, an estimated 3,000 people in
New
York and Washington, D.C. that are now dead would be alive today.
And, now that Bush is taking action to bring these people to
justice, we
have opponents charging him with being a war monger...
AN INTERESTING QUESTION:
This question was raised on a Philly radio call-in show. Without
casting
stones, it is a legitimate question.
There are two men, both extremely wealthy. One develops relatively
cheap
software and gives billions of dollars to charity. The other sponsors
terrorism. That being the case, why was it that the Clinton
Administration
spent more money chasing down Bill Gates over the past eight years than
Osama bin Laden?
THINK ABOUT IT!
It is a strange turn of events. Hillary gets $8 Million for her
forthcoming memoir. Bill gets about $12 Million for his memoir yet to
be
written.
This from two people who have spent the past 8 years being unable
to
recall anything about past events while under oath!
Tell me this didn't kill any people!!!!!
2006-12-31 05:02:15 · answer #1 · answered by sirblackie88 4 · 6⤊ 2⤋
Hillary Clinton is an fabulous candidate. Conservatives pretending to be Democrats expressing concern that she would be able to't win (whilst she leads each and every pollcontained in the sector) purely flow to tutor how disturbing they're approximately her. We help Clinton through fact she has a formidable and compassionate plan for united statesa. and he or she would be able to grant on that promise.
2016-12-11 19:51:59 · answer #2 · answered by degennaro 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't know about blowing them out of the water, I just like their hypocritical stances. I have said that there are things that Bush should have done different., like giving the Military planners the mission and let the Generals meet the objective. Let the men that fight the wars determine the best direction to accomplish the mission handed them by the Commander-in-Chief!
2006-12-31 05:08:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Well it is true that no one died when Clinton lied. It's not the ryhme you resent, it's the fact. And how anyone can stand by Bush is a ******* joke, and it is the republicans that sell slogans as their base tends to be small minded hicks that can't understand ideas strecthing beyond three words.
2006-12-31 18:45:14 · answer #4 · answered by Crystal S 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Thank you this is what I've been trying to say for years to every one. The democrats are as low down as the core of the earth. Now while I have to admit the GOP arnt saints, democrats only care about 1 thing... Power. Dose any one for a second belive Clinton gives 3 cents about the people of New York. She's only thier so she can get the nice 34 electoral votes in 2008. If she could have done well in CA or TX she would have but because thier ussually republican she would have to work hard to get elected. Also did any one notice who really comes up with those bs slander adds we get every year in august-nov? the democrats. all they do is sladner the GOp never saying for a second what they did for our country (because they havnt done anything) Thanks for posting this maybe some of the liberals will have the little light bulb above thier head turn on after reading this....not likely
2006-12-31 05:08:37 · answer #5 · answered by rkjr1999 2 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Very simply I don't give a damn, I don't criticize Bush because of air America or Bill Clinton or anyone else says about him. I criticize bush because I'm a fairly well educated adult who has seen for himself the mistakes Bush has made over the past 6 years and is concerned about the future of this country.
As far as Clinton and Enron are concerned, I'll address the issue when you and nonalcoholic2 present the entire story. In the meantime why don't you research how the republicans tried to cut off funding a program to fight AIDS in Uganda, a program that was working, because it involved the distribution of condoms,
2006-12-31 05:05:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
NY is the most sophistacated, the most cosmopolitan & the most intelligent city in the nation, that's why it's mostly democrat & that is why Hillary Clinton chose it. It challenges her & matches her intelligence. We could do no better, and would be so lucky to have her as our next president. I don't care if you give me a dozen thumbs down.
2006-12-31 07:36:14 · answer #7 · answered by mstrywmn 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Do tardo's like you know that you are supposed to be asking a question, or do you think that this forum is called "yahoo rants with horrible grammar and an IQ below 60"? It's not. So what is the question tardo? Or are you like your demi-god Bush and at a loss for intelligent words? It's amazing, with people like this, there is absolutely no reason to crack on the Neo-con right. They show us all every day why they got voted out of office, with their smarty pants supporters, like this tardo.
2006-12-31 05:01:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
well at least Clinton could give an understandable address to the nation.
2006-12-31 05:06:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
Yeah right, Clinton's BJ's killed tens of thousands of people? NOT
2006-12-31 04:57:54 · answer #10 · answered by Kacky 7 · 5⤊ 4⤋