English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I'm amazed at the number of people who still think GWBush is the greatest thing. He's a terrible president and a liar. How can you still like him knowing what he's done? Read:
George W. Bush ordered a War of Aggression against Iraq. This constitutes a Crime Against Peace - for which Nazi leaders were prosecuted at the Nuremberg Trials - and violates the UN Charter.

Iraq never attacked the US or threatened an attack, so the US was not acting legally in self-defense, which is permitted under the UN Charter.
Iraq played no role in the September 11, 2001 attack on the US and never provided material support to any terrorist group that attacked the US, so even the non-legal Bush doctrine of pre-emptive attack did not apply.

2006-12-31 04:50:50 · 15 answers · asked by Rosebee 4 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

At the time of the US attack, Iraq was nearing full compliance with UN Resolution 1441 and prior resolutions requiring disarmament, and the majority of the Security Council believed UN inspectors should be given more time, so the US was not enforcing UN resolutions, as it claims.
George W. Bush ordered the invasion of Iraq in order to bring about a regime change, which was never authorized by a UN resolution, and violates the UN Charter

A Crime Against Peace is defined as "planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression, or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances, or participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the foregoing." By invading Iraq, Bush has committed a Crime Against Peace.


Are you open minded enough to learn the truth? Read more here:
http://elandslide.org/elandslide/petition.cfm?campaign=warcrimes&refer=home

2006-12-31 04:52:59 · update #1

Nonalcoholic2, the UN mandate was in 2005 during the Iraqi election. It expired January 2006 - A YEAR ago.

2006-12-31 05:06:23 · update #2

15 answers

First of all, Bush is NOT a good man as many people on here are saying. There is so much evidence you will find if you aren't too lazy to do a little digging, that he is a terrible, terrible president and person.

I'm not going to provide links for the lazy naysayers, because they won't bother reading them anyway. But if you can get out of your "Bush is King" state of mind, I suggest doing a google search with the following Keywords:
Impeach Bush
War crimes Bush
Hurricane Katrina Bush
Downingstreet Memo
Haliburton Contracts Bush

That would provide plenty of reading material for you. Even if Bush was guilty of .01% of the allegations, He still deserves to be impeached.


There's a reason why Bush's numbers are so low. Only 30 percent of the country thinks he's doing a good job. There's a reason why the USA voted to clean out the house and the senate. It's because we are not going to stand by and let Bush crap our rights away, and wipe his butt with the constitution. We the people have had enough.

I challenge all those Bush lovers who support his war, to go enlist and go over to Iraq.

Yes, it's easy to spout propaganda. And if you don't know the facts or don't bother to read the facts posted by the questioner, you just open yourself up to looking ridiculous. Half of these answers didn't even bother to read the entire queston.

The previous actions that have been taken to rectify Iraq happened in the past. Those actions have led to a quagmire in Iraq, no matter how well intentioned they were. They did not solve anything.

I'm ending this for all of you who blindly follow Bush: Get the facts before you shoot your mouth off. Do a little reading, and try to use your brains instead of insulting the questioner and calling names like a five year old.

2007-01-01 03:44:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I think you need to go back a re-read your history the Nazi's at Nuremberg were prosecuted for Crimes against humanity, in the murder of 6 million Jews.

As for the UN it is nothing more than a impudent puppet government with no power whatsoever to do anything. Since we are on the subject of legality, war was never officially declared so in a legal sense this war is not a war but a conflict, police action, take your pick. But why split hares a war by any other name is still just a war. And since when did any world leader give a North bound rat's South end about whether the war they were waging was legal or not? Why does it matter? What can we mere peasants do about it? The only thing that can be trusted about any politician is that he/she will lie. So get over it already.

2006-12-31 06:45:21 · answer #2 · answered by ikeman32 6 · 0 3

I hate Dubaya with a passion. He led us into Iraq for no reason. 9/11 was caused by 1 Egyptian, 2 Emirates, I Lebanese, and 15 Saudis. I don't see how Iraq fits into that description. Besides, who goes to war over a terrorist attack?, no offense. Terrorism is like Prostitution. It's been around forever and it will be around forever. What is Iraq now? We have literally burned it to the ground. We've begun a civil war. He'll be going down as the worst American president ever.

2006-12-31 05:03:32 · answer #3 · answered by IrishBrazilGurl 1 · 2 2

Ohhh, the bleeding heart liberal is whining again.

Impeached on what charges? Stop whining and just do it if you have charges for impeachment...OH? Can't impeach because there is no basis? Ohhhh, OHHHHH, Ohhhh. Let's all whine like puppies.

Get off your high horse and face the facts. The US was attacked, the US went after the attackers and any declared enemy of the US. We have not had a major incident since. Even YOU are safer than you were.

The wisdom of attacking Iraq will be debated for years and if George is guilty of anything, it will be bad judgment...but the event is not over yet. What does he know that we don;t and we cannot.know. That is why we elect presidents. To have the majority put someone in that represents us.

Go ahead and elect your whiny democratic candidate next election. Watch the economy deteriorate while they raise taxes and watch our enemies invade us while you cower behind your whiny facade.

2006-12-31 05:03:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

Why don't you and the ones that agree with you crawl back into the hole that you crawl out off ! How would you like it if some fractors of a country atacked you and your leader when to war with them ,. That is exalty what Iraq and Iran and the whole nation of Islam DON'T YOU DARE GO ATTACKING MY PRESIDENT FOR SOMETHING THAT NEED TO BE DONE !!!
AND ALSO THE uSA STARTED THE uN IN THE FIRST PLACE SO THEY CAN JUST AS EASILY SAT GET OUT WE NO LONGER WANT THE uN !!! AND WHILE i AM HERE WHY DON'T YOU AND YOU FRIEND AND THE REST OF THE ANTI - AMERICAN S GO TO HELL !!~~~

2006-12-31 05:06:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

I think he is doing a great job.Better than Kerry could ever.
Becuase Kerry wouldn't even had us in the war.
If we weren't in that war.America could have been bombed again,or some terrorist take it over.I rather not risk my life thank you very much.
Please.Iraq never treathened the US.
9/11.
That is a lie.They had to do with it.Some major leaders in it were from Iraq.
Plus they are killing their own people over there,and they are making mass weapons so we needed to go over there.
Get your facts right.

2006-12-31 05:33:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

1- First of all George Bush is just a puppet, he listens to the war commanders/generals and his war advisors.
2- Regardless if someone attacked u i think most likely 90% of the people in this world would do something about it not just stand there and hit. U fight back.
3- As one of the strongest countries i guess we have the responsiblity to "improve" other countries.

2006-12-31 05:14:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

Did you know in November that the UN mandated an extension of 160,000 troops in Iraq?

http://mensnewsdaily.com/blog/2005/11/un-extends-coalition-mandate-in-iraq.htm

2006-12-31 04:58:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5 2

i honestly think he is a good man and i stand by his decision to get Iraq before they get us. if Iraq had been let to attack us first you'd be singin a different tune and a lot more people in America would have died than just the 9/11 victims

2006-12-31 05:02:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

I don't like GWB because he is destroying Iraq and Americas reputation. Everyday he is the cause of hundreds of people death. Iraq was better off under saddam because now innocent people are being killed. And bush doesn't care because he isn't the one who is fighting there so he couldn't care less about the soldiers who are risking their lives for us. He sends them out there to make him a good name and make himself seem like a hero for capturing saddam, man bush is the biggest idiot i have ever seen. He is just as bad if not worse than condoleza rice dumb b****

2006-12-31 04:56:53 · answer #10 · answered by Aaron 2 · 1 5

fedest.com, questions and answers