Do all Countries around the world... still need to ask For MR Bush's permission before having nuclear weapons?

Question

is president Bush the de Facto Ruler of the world????

Answer 1

No, this is a United Nations matter. But, the US has basically become the strong arm in any matter the UN gets invloved in. We have become the police force of the world. Some people ask who made us the Police Force of the world, I always say the world did.

When the tsunamis hit in Asia, who did the countries hit look to for aid? Who came forth and rendered the aid? When Katrina hit, who came to our aid on the same level in which we do when disasters occur elsewhere?

Answer 2

Would the world be better off if every single nation had nuclear weapons? Regardless of how we feel about Bush, isn't it pretty clear to people that nuclear proliferation is not a good thing? Many nations actually signed the nuclear non-proliferation treaty at one point, agreeing not to attempt to develop nuclear weapons in exchange for receiving aid.

Answer 3

Your question bags an evidence earlier an answer.usa received such guns lower than diverse circumstances of chilly warfare the position more suitable than a danger, a deterrence change into the desire.nicely,it truly is a lengthy tale.Coming to the cutting-edge cases,the middle challenge isn't the possession of guns by different countries inspite of the indisputable fact that the life of a suitable command tructure,political stability and protection of such guns even as contained in the fingers of such international places.for instance,Iran could have the nuclear guns inspite of the indisputable fact that this is command structure and political stability isn't strong sufficient to verify that such guns are literally not allowed to fall in to incorrect fingers and consequently pose a danger to the global peace.also,if u.s. destroys all this is nuclear guns,are you able to imagine the kind of world politics thereafter?The political values which brought on you to placed up this question is of least challenge to many human beings,politicians or perhaps some Governments and they ought to study some issues contained in the language they comprehend, for the pastime of world peace and stability.

Answer 4

No let's just give them to every nutcase ruler in the world and then we can all just get along. Why don't people understand that he is just trying to protect the sovereignty of the United States for the next generation.

Can someone please tell me why stupidity is so rampant on this site on the part of the President Bush haters?

Answer 5

No. Generally this issue is handled (poorly) by the United Nations.

And he should be referred to as "President Bush", not Mr. Bush.

And while he is the President of the only superpower in the world, he is not the de factor ruler of the world.

Answer 6

The countries don't need to ask just America.. Bush isn't king of our country but just a temp ruler. Anyhow they have to ask the United Nations committe if they can have nuclear weapons. I'm not too sure who is the head hancho in the U.N. but I know Bush is thrid from the top since he is the leader of a powerful country. Try searching for the United Nations in yahoo! or google, that should be able to tell you everything

Answer 7

Can I call your father and have him sign you up for a 4 year hitch in the US Marine Corps when and "if" you graduate from high school?

It will be the best experience of your life. For now, your still a foolish chucklehead that should pick up a civics book and learn how our goverment works.

Answer 8

Now hold that thought. Ask again when the next democrat that is president reacts to nukes in the same manner.

Answer 9

well, YEAH.....you didn't KNOW that??

Answer 10

Like someone else said, the stupidity on this site never ceases to amaze me.