Prove me I am wrong. The trial is over and verdict says he killed 147 Shiites. Period.
10.000 Kurds that have been gased to death were killed by Iran. Iraq had nothing to do with that. The US government supported this for a long time. Give me proof that Saddam did that?
I do not want to blame anybody I just need the truth. Please, give me the proof that Saddam was a killer. Why are you so brainwashed here? Saddam was here why they hanged him that fast? Why do you believe everything you are said without asking for proofs? I do not believe the media. I believe the trials and judge verdicts.
2006-12-31 04:25:47 · 24 answers · asked by Lion 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes the proof matters all for me. Give the proof!!!
2006-12-31 04:30:04 · update #1
Listen all you are saying are just words. I need the proof. We live in a civilized country. We are not like them, right? So?
2006-12-31 04:31:34 · update #2
He killed Shiites there right. But Shiites killed Sunnies either. They were fighting all time there. Saddam was defending himself and Sunnies. Give me the proof I am wrong!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2006-12-31 04:33:25 · update #3
Listen I am not defending Saddam I just want know the truth and I need the proof
2006-12-31 04:34:56 · update #4
Listen they all there are bad. They all are animals and are killing one another everyday. Thats there life
2006-12-31 04:35:52 · update #5
If Saddam was bad means nothing to me. I need the proof that he was involved in killing thousands as some say. If I have no proof I do not beleive it
2006-12-31 04:37:35 · update #6
The last minutes of Saddam Hussein were as follows:
Saddam (as the noose is put around his neck): Ya Allah (Oh God).
Someone in the audience: Mercy be on those who pray for Mohammed and the household of Mohammed. (Everyone repeats the prayer, including Saddam.)
Executioner and two people in the audience: And hasten his return (the Mehdi), curse his enemy and grant victory to his son, Muqtada, Muqtada, Muqtada! (This is a common Sadrist chant.)
Saddam (smirking): Muqtada?
NSA Muwafaq Al-Rubai'i: To Hell!
Saddam: (laughing)
Prosecutor Munqidh Al-Far'awn: Please, no.
Muwafaq Al-Rubi'i: Long live Mohammed Baqir Al-Sadr!
Someone in the audience: To Hell!
Saddam (solemnly recites the Shahada prayer): I witness that there is no god but Allah, and that Mohammed is the messenger of Allah. I witness that there is no god but Allah, and that Mohammed is the- (trap door is opened).
Audience: Prayers for Mohammed and the household of Mohammed.
Someone: The tyrant has fell. May Allah's curse be upon him.
Someone: No. No. Stay back.
Someone: Leave him for 8 minutes. Don't take him down.
Someone: Everyone. Stay back.
---
2007-01-01 03:00:43 · answer #1 · answered by Ivri_Anokhi 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you want proof Saddam killed others as in the gassing of the Kurds, just follow the trial. Numerous documents have been shown to the court that authorizes the use of "special weapons" against the Kurds and they were said and issued by Saddam Hussein himself and he has admitted to signing those documents. What kind of proof do you need? Do you need to see his diary saying he admits to doing it? If you believe the trials and verdicts, then the evidence presented during the trials that finds him guilty is your truth. Iran did not kill the Kurds. Saddam did not like anybody but Sunni's and those loyal to the Baathist Party.
2007-01-01 14:28:20 · answer #2 · answered by frijol7877 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well you say you "believe the trials and judge verdicts" so I guess you are feeling ok with that maniac being dead. I think they should make the day of his death a new national holiday :) maybe come up with a new handing saddam bobblehead..lol
Anyway, to answer your question..yes Saddam killed many more than the 142 he was convicted for. It's gotta be hard to get witnesses when he is killing everyone, so I suppose they prosecuted him with the best case they had.
I do agree that they killed him aweful fast though. They had 30 full days in which to kill him. They could have spent that time torturing him and then drug him to the gallows on day 30 :)
2006-12-31 12:32:44 · answer #3 · answered by crazylifer 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How about the fact that he singled out 58 members of the Iraqi legislature upon taking office and deemed them spies and had them killed?
How about the minister in his cabinet who, near the end of the Iran-Iraq war, suggested he should step down for a while to aid the peace process? His body was sent home the next day to his wife, hacked to pieces.
If you don't think Saddam was a brutal killer, you're very wrong
2006-12-31 12:29:28 · answer #4 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
March 29, 1988: In the final months of his war on Iran, Saddam ordered the gassing of the Kurdish town of Halabja--killing 5,000 and maiming 10,000.
2006-12-31 16:37:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Fact is he was our ally until he invaded Kuwait. We looked the other way at his murderous ways for decades and supplied him with arms and WMD's. No doubt that there is alot of embarrassing information about his relationship with the U.S. that would have come out if all of his crimes came to trial.
We basically railroaded a guilty man on 1 count, because we did'nt want to have the rest of his crimes and our involvement, and complicity made public at trial.
Everybody always talks about the gassings. Well, why weren't they a part of his trial?
I've heard that the gas was U.S. supplied from the days when he was shaking hands with Rumsfeld and the Reagan administration.
2006-12-31 22:57:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
well he did gas the kurds, ur are believing the media by saying he didnt, saddam only wanted death to america and was training al-qaeda members in iraq and had WMDs, so u should stop listening to the media and actually look at the truth.
2006-12-31 12:39:42 · answer #7 · answered by libshateme 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Saddam was bad, just as many other dictators around the world. The point to be discussed is the U.S. entrance into a war. There is no justification for the war.
Terrorism? no direct link to terrorists has been found.
Dictatorship? there are other cruel dictators all over the globe.
Threat? Other countries are far more threatening (N.Korea)
Humanitarian reasons? why not help the millions dying of poverty in Africa?
2006-12-31 12:34:43 · answer #8 · answered by XM 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
What are you saying?!!
Saddam has killed millions of innocent people during his life. Have you forgotten the mass graves, the war against Iran, the mass killings of Kurds? The biological and chemical weapons that he used?? ......
2007-01-01 21:45:18 · answer #9 · answered by Massiha 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Does the answer matter? Even if there was a list of 3mil people that he did kill and there was proof of that. He would've still got the death penalty. Rather rejoice that the pig got what he deserved.
2006-12-31 12:28:47 · answer #10 · answered by Clio 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋