Saddam Hussein's death: has America achieved anything?

Question

I suppose our "Looser in Chief" and his British poodle should stop doing anything outside their countries for the world's sake.

Their accomplishments:
* Hard liners elected in Iran and "Palestine" since our "Looser in Chief" took power
* Iran and North Korea being a bigger threat
* Massacres in Lebanon and Gaza
* Disaster in Iraq and Afganistan

And if you are naive enough to think the US and UK have no responsibility for all of this, please do not show your ignorance by posting a message here. Thank you!

"Who is friend with who"? See photo below:
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/

Answer 1

I doubt it, and I'll be glad when everybody finds something else to talk about!

Answer 2

I think the Us and the Uk have achieved quite a bit. They have managed to make our two nations the most hated in history. Even our allies are backing away from us and are embarrassed by our actions. We are as a country so divided and hated by others traveling abroad is very dangerous.But thank god we are still free!!!
Or wait , are we? We the usa are the only country that cant play on party poker . com. Wait isnt fema supposed to help in times of disaster? They with homeland security are building billions of dollars worth of detention camps or public holding centers as they are so fondly called.Research the information is out there. But please do so in a hurry because our rights are being stripped very fast. The internet will be controlled if we do not stand up against this blatant abuse of power.

Answer 3

Has America achieved anything?

Well not yet, but yes in the near future it is going to.

Bush made life miserable for Iraqis, and his acts is going to make it even more miserable for Americans in future. Some of you might be very well understanding what I'm refering to - what goes around, comes around.

Had the question of Iraq possessing nuclear weapon not been on the first place itself. Does anyone believe that America would have declared a war on Iraq just coz Saddam had been a brutal dictator way back in past.

So if it all started for having nuclear warhead, where are those 'SO' called liberal American who didn't raised a question on one nation having WMD and not allowing the other to have it.

Answer 4

Yes Saddam Hussein's death will make other depotic leaders in the world realise they are not safe to brutalise their people anymore. The UN allowed Saddam to continue leading his brutal regime just like they allow others. That's why we needed the United States and the United Kingdom to take action. It's a great lesson to other dictators and is a step forward for the world.

A mass confrontation between Sunni and Shia muslims in the middle east may turn out to be a very good thing in the same way that the American civil war created something good for the long term. I'm taking the long view here of course and in the mean time a lot of people are going to suffer. That is because of Islam and the bigotry between it's sects.
If people in the middle east really wanted the US and UK to continue propping up brutal secular dictators they should have made that very clear to us. I think that in fact the opposite message was being sent to us. Now it is up to muslims in the middle east to sort out their religious issues and then maybe civilised politics will follow.

Answer 5

Well lets see who's the looser
1.: No attacks on American citizens since we got pissed
2.: Lybia (a known terrorist sponsor) volentarily gives up its wepons of mass destruction
3.: Millions of Iraqi people do not have to worry about their so called leader killing them or tortureing them
4.: Millons of Afgani people have the freedom that they have never had before you know to vote in their own represenitives, show their faces in public (women) if they want without the threat of being stoned to death or publicly beaten
5.: Osama Binladen is no longer a descernable threat as he is being hunted down like the wretched pig that he is and must keep moveing to avoid being blown to bits
6.: As long as we stay in both countries we are taken seriously by the rest of the world.
7.: The UN has been exposed as the joke it really is
8.: We are close enough to strike at Iran or any other Middle Eastern country, Have demonstrated the resolve and resources to do so when and if there is a percieved threat we can and will act and do not think they do not know it.
9.: The extremest doctorine has been exposed for what it is and condemmed both by educated free thinking people arround the world and by Muslems who recognize that their religon has been coopted by the most perveted extremests for their own gains.
Is that enough? I can go on and on.
Perhaps we should have aquiessed like Jimmy Carter did (you know when he gave legitamacy to the extremeist doctorine by doing nothing when Iran melted down) just let it happen.
Or maybe you think that fool John Kerry would have done better (when he wasnt crippled by constantly changeing his mind)
Or Al Gore when he wasnt preoccupied by the MYTH of Global Warming?
OH wait youre waiting for your saviors wife to ride in on her high horse and fix everything by castrating the military.
Our Comander in Chief is a fine man and great leader so back the F*ck off you idiot and get your head (and facts) straight...

Answer 6

you're claiming that one international chief has had adequate effect to totally harm Iran, N Korea, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Lebanon. in case you think that Bush performed a function in all of that, then it actually does not be a stretch to think of that Saddam had some function interior the 9/11 assaults. sturdy Lord, people. Get actual.

Answer 7

First thing they achieved is to show the US people the image of a punisher a saviour hero after what happenned on 9/11. Thus, possibly they managed to control and diminish the terror and fear of people towards foreigners and AntiAmericans, a fear that the government itself initiated.
Secondly, Bush probably wanted to show off once more his power to his enemies and allies just in case...
Another reason for doing this might be to demonstrate clearly to Alquaeda his power and what he is determined to do when it is needed.
What's for sure thought is that history will speak the truth around it.
No-one shall play God when on earth as Justice will come in time. whatever it was true or false that Saddam did it's not up to one person to decide its punishment, for the punisher is not innocent pure of spirit.

Answer 8

Neither the US nor the UK have ever, in their long histories of global interference, intervened in anything on humanitarian grounds. The whole thing is about oil and the wider commercial ramifications of chanking world economies. If either country were so concerned...why did they not stop events in Bosnia and Rwanda??

The US in particular has always played on the fears of its own people by demonising foreign powers in order to provice a flimsy cover for its actions. First it was communism, now it's Islam.
They run around the world screaming danger, when in fact the US is the most dangerous state on the planet...this made worse by its leader being an illiterate bigot.

It is difficult to see how you get Bush to take responsibility when he can't even spell the word.


Added;

crawler...what an incredibly apt name!
The next time a terrorist atrocity kills innocent people in America...I want you to sit and watch and take your share of the blame. Because you are the reason that more innocent Americans are going to die. It is YOUR fault. YOUR arrogance caused this...just like the arrogance of that chimp you call a commander in chief.

Answer me this...why does the worlds richest nation have a 50% illiteracy rate???...just answer that question!!...Could it be something to do with needing stupid people to elect who they are told to elect???...Could it?...HUH???

Answer 9

Yes America's achievement was impeccable they done a grand job..by killing Saddam Hussein..they eliminated the biggest threat that hang over their heads...
A 70 year old man who could have escaped from prison
built another Army ..Navy ..and strong Air force then regain control of Iraq ..and re occupied it's neighbouring territories .how pathetic..I use this word a lot now it suits occasion

Answer 10

America: NO.

But for the first time in modern history, an Arab country dictator has been tried and executed by his people. I hope other dictators and absolute monarchs will sit a little uneasy on the thrones, in that part of the world.

Answer 11

For sure Saddam was a tyrant. But I think his punishment should have been left up to GOD. His earthly punishment should have been life imprisonment, to languish in prison for the rest of his sad, sorry days. That would have been worse than death.We should not take lives, that is up to the LORD.

I am not siding with this horrible excuse for a human, but to kill for any reason is wrong. I am sure he is being dealt with right now, by our MAKER.