English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I suppose our "Looser in Chief" and his British poodle should stop doing anything outside their countries for the world's sake.

Their accomplishments:
* Hard liners elected in Iran and "Palestine" since our "Looser in Chief" took power
* Iran and North Korea being a bigger threat
* Massacres in Lebanon and Gaza
* Disaster in Iraq and Afganistan

And if you are naive enough to think the US and UK have no responsibility for all of this, please do not show your ignorance by posting a message here. Thank you!

"Who is friend with who"? See photo below:
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/

2006-12-31 04:20:13 · 19 answers · asked by s0190331 3 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

19 answers

I doubt it, and I'll be glad when everybody finds something else to talk about too !

2006-12-31 04:34:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

You are claiming that one world leader has had enough influence to totally ruin Iran, N Korea, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Lebanon. If you believe that Bush played a role in all of that, then it surely wouldn't be a stretch to think that Saddam had some role in the 9/11 attacks.

Good Lord, people. Get real.

2006-12-31 05:54:06 · answer #2 · answered by kelly24592 5 · 0 0

Thanks for this question. Some of the responses I am reading unfortunately show that most people are very very naive and want to believe whatever is said on news or TV or in papers. For those who think that the hanging of Saddam was an Iraqi decision, please WAKE UP! the US government has invaded the country, installed a fake government, orchestrated a fake tribunal, and a fake court of law. americans not being visible does not mean they are not mehind every single proceedings of this court. They just have muppets who will execute their orders. They could as well have just killed him immediately rather than pretending they would let hm be judged by his own people. Obviously, knowing the history of Iraq, if you let a chiite lead government and tribumal judge Saddam, you cannot expect a different outcome. It's a if you let the jews judge Hitler. Daaaa. If the american wanted a fair judgemen, they should have let him be judged for ALL his crimes (incluing the kurds massacres which no one talks aout), let the fact be laid for everyone to see and to know. Killing Saddam for the murder of a hundred of Iraqis is so stupid. Then again, I have not heard of any dictator who has known the same fate in this century. Double standards. Peter Botha was the father of Apartheid in South Africa, he killed thousands and thousands of black people (but of cours i's not important, they were only black people), and for years, the US and Europe maintain economic ties with South Africa under apartheid...! when Mandela was freed, Botha was not hanged for crimes that are documented and which everybody knows about. He actually lived to see a prosperous country being built by white and black people living peacefully together. Why has this option not considered for Saddam??? He could have been jailed for life in a different country or even on American soil, and see that Iraq can overcome its divisions and prosper under a democratic rule. To answer this question: killing Saddam has achieved one thing: millions of muslims around the world are upset, and consider him a martyr, and have prayed for his soul to rest in peace. God is a better judge for all of us. Now the americans are contemplating what to do with a country that has been struggling with civil wars, killing of innocents, divisions, and an incompetent and weak government unable to make things work. Thank you USA, but enough now, just go back home, we'll clean the mess after you.

2006-12-31 04:46:41 · answer #3 · answered by Lisa 3 · 0 1

Heck no. Okay, Saddam's dead. Last night on CNN, several soldiers stationed in Iraq were interviewed, and they ALL said that their superiors told them not to expect any change in Iraq because of Saddam's hanging, if anything things will be worse.

The homeland security has even raised the alert, saying a terrorist attack is highly probable.

How is this helping us???? It's NOT.

2006-12-31 05:00:00 · answer #4 · answered by Rosebee 4 · 0 0

i think of the U. S. and the united kingdom have comprehensive plenty. they have controlled to make our 2 international locations the main hated in history. Even our allies are backing faraway from us and are embarrassed with the aid of our movements. we are as a united states so divided and hated with the aid of others vacationing in a foreign country is relatively risky.yet thank god we are nevertheless loose!!! Or wait , are we? We the u . s . a . are the only united states that cant play on occasion poker . com. Wait isnt fema meant to help in circumstances of disaster? They with native land risk-free practices are construction billions of greenbacks relatively worth of detention camps or public retaining centers as they are so fondly referred to as.study the education is obtainable. yet please gain this in a hurry because of the fact our rights are being stripped very quickly. the internet would be controlled if we don't arise by contrast blatant abuse of potential.

2016-11-25 02:54:05 · answer #5 · answered by woolf 4 · 0 0

America has not achieved anything. It has made people happy but it has just pissed off the Islamic radicals even more and now they want revenge. what is better a slight increase in taxes or having people blowing up america for some dumb g-d. It is because of bush that we can't live in peace with them anymore. We used to be good allies now look what happend.

2006-12-31 04:28:56 · answer #6 · answered by Aaron 2 · 0 2

Hey raghead lover, we didn't kill this guy, his own people did! Why is it that you miserable Bush haters insist on interpreting everything from your perspective whether it makes sense or not?

Under "their accomplishments" category, I see old banjo eyes Ahmadinejad's signature on practically every one of your catagories, including the death od Saddam Hussein.

2006-12-31 05:04:24 · answer #7 · answered by briang731/ bvincent 6 · 0 0

First, that picture was taken when the US and Iraq were allies.

Second, the Iraqi Government sentenced and put Saddam to death, not the US. Why is that so hard to believe?

2006-12-31 04:25:10 · answer #8 · answered by greencoke 5 · 1 1

heck naw the didn't acheive anything there are other people like sadamm hussien who want peace, and just by hanging him didn't do anything, to think at first when bush was elected president i told my dad to vote for him cuz his speech sounded persuasive and i guess it was. now i noe who to blame everything on instead of terrorist ,cuz i use to say y did these dumb terrorist do this now their making all muslims as terrorist, y couldn't they just think for a moment. its both bush's fault the terrorist and who ever was in this conflict.and dem poor soliders fighting for their country innocently killed not all of dem should get gratitude rapping women killing children all of this makes me sick. NO OFFENSE

2006-12-31 04:31:01 · answer #9 · answered by mimi14 1 · 0 0

well we only stopped a wolrd threat in saddam and we killed his closest people, we have taken a bigger step, now we jsut need to get bin laden then everything will be better, u should stop watchinh fox news and cnn

2006-12-31 04:41:46 · answer #10 · answered by libshateme 3 · 0 0

I guess America as a nation is not to be blamed at all for this.A very controversial event ,and it will always remain so because of its timing.

2006-12-31 04:38:17 · answer #11 · answered by Strange_Truth 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers