2006-12-31 03:14:53 · 18 answers · asked by NONAME 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
And THAT's your limit of questions for the day. Good bye. :D
2006-12-31 03:16:14 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 3⤋
Considering how the ACLU and the rest of the alphabet soup liberal organizations are pushing more and more political correctness in our daily speech and seeking to define more and more of it as hate speech, your contention that it is President Bush or his supporters who hate freedom of speech is PURE UNADULTERATED FALLACY.
It also is and has been the agenda of liberals and Democrats to see to it that it remains legal to slaughter 1.5 million infants every year since the late 1960's by way of keeping abortion legal. What more hateful act can you perpetrate on a child that their wholesale slaughter?
Maybe you should move to Fantasyland, where facts and logic don't apply, and you can make it all up as you go..........
2006-12-31 05:10:49 · answer #2 · answered by Yote' 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Bush supporters love united states too, and could no longer take a "take a seat and sing Kumbaya with the enemy" attitude. The question exhibits the lack of wisdom of the asker, conflict is a mandatory evil interior the international. potential comes with the flexibility to dominate. We gained the chilly conflict because of the fact Russia knew Reagan might use the weapons we had. So no person needs squaddies to die, yet all of us love our freedoms.
2016-11-25 02:49:07 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Liberals are the free speech haters. What do you think "political correctness" is all about? I believe freedom of speech protects "hate speech"!
I should be allowed to say anything I want about people. I believe small business owners should be allowed to let people smoke in their bars. I also believe small business owners should be allowed to hire whomever they want.
These, among a multitude of other restrictions "liberals" have forced upon America in the name of "political correctness" and protection from ourselves.
Liberals have define themselves through action to mean restriction. Isn't that the opposite of liberal?
Liberals (socialists) are the ones who should pack up and move. They would be happy in Cuba I'm sure.
2006-12-31 03:29:48 · answer #4 · answered by Ransom 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Where's your proof?? All of your questions are full of hateful accusations with no evidence whatsoever. But that's OK, liberals are allowed to do that. I guess that means that you still have your freedom of speech.
2006-12-31 03:52:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Considering the fact that you seem to hate the fact that President Bush and his supporters HAVE freedom of speech, maybe YOU should move.
2006-12-31 03:18:28 · answer #6 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 7⤊ 3⤋
Where do you get your info. The people that hate freedom of speech is the crazy people like the ACLU. They don't even want you to say Merry Christmas.
2006-12-31 03:22:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Can we change the subject now?
If we could quit obsessing over an overworked president we might have more time to address REAL issues.
2006-12-31 03:25:12 · answer #8 · answered by Action 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why are you saying that we hate freedom of speech, and kids? Where is your proof? What because of all the illeagal alliens and all the terrorist , we do need to protect ourselves. If CLinton wasn't to busy with monica, Osma would not have been a threat and saddam would have been taken care of years ago.
2006-12-31 03:19:41 · answer #9 · answered by Right Wing Extremist 7 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Considering that Bush and his supporters don't hate any of the above, I think they should stay.
2006-12-31 03:17:33 · answer #10 · answered by Lily VonSchtupp 3 · 6⤊ 3⤋
I don't know how you can say that with a straight face...we have endured you ad nauseum today....and we aren't mad at you...lol.
2006-12-31 03:50:23 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋