SHIITE EXECUTIONERS CHANTING AT SADDAM MOMENTS BEFORE EXECUTION...SUNNIS ARE GONNA FREAK! CIVIL WAR TO WORSEN.
Quote
Moments before Saddam's hanging (he is a Sunni), the guards began chanting Shia slogans. The slogans concerned Moqtada al Sadr, among other things. This is on the cell phone video currently posted.
This is DEEPLY DEEPLY offensive to the Sunnis, and will GUARANTEED exacerbate the civil war...they will no doubt feel that the majority Shiites will in time repress or kill them off, and the treatment of Saddam at his moment of death is evidence of this.
It almost seems staged to me---like the guards were TOLD to be offensive. Something is REALLY odd about this whole episode- the frenzy to quickly hang him, the timing before a Muslim religious holiday, and now the fact that the guards were deeply offensive and theatrical.
Read about it:
[link to blogs.abcnews.com]
2006-12-31 01:49:25 · 10 answers · asked by WORD UP G 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I think it was an action that had to be. Do not expect to go unpunished for actions taken that caused the death of thousands. Saddam exercised the power of God. Did you think that God would put up with that? It will be a very long time before he will be reborn into the hell of Earth. The Land of nothing is not a quest to have worked for. We have our free will and it will be that Saddam hangs, not God's wish, nor God's glory. God is within all things and Religion has nothing to do with it. God was before man, earth and the moon and stars, if this planet was no more where in heck would you be.
2006-12-31 03:38:11 · answer #1 · answered by blueridgemotors 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Regardless of how you feel about the death penalty what Saddam received for his actions was far kinder than what he gave out. To die by poisonous gas is a horrible way to die.
And his torture chambers were most horrible. If you believe he did not deserve to hang how can you feel good about what he did? Or perhaps you choose not to believe that.
Saddam took control as most dictators do by insuring that any dissenters were no longer around to decent. While holding a session of the IRAQ congress he begin to tell them how it was going to be. As each member begin to protest his men marched them out of the chamber and shot them. It was not long before their were no more dissenters.
This alone was a barbaric act that warranted death.
Time will tell what the aftermath will be.
2006-12-31 02:37:14 · answer #2 · answered by John B 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What Good did it accomplish is all I have to say ,
besides this .
What ever possessed America to believe she is the answer to the problems faced by people under the rule of a horrible leader who's only answer is to kill what does not fit nicely into his program of self love , greed and vision of world control .
Saddam just had one little section that sat a top an oil field or he would of never gotten any attention at all and would still be ruling today .
2006-12-31 01:56:02 · answer #3 · answered by -----JAFO---- 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Given the present months activities and the "inner" Iraqi recommendations-set/conflict among they selves, I say; that in the process the previous you positioned any execution date; Saddam would desire to be enable "loose" upon those cowards whom are killing each and each others women folk, the previous, the harmless, and their little ones. human beings like those basically comprehend one difficulty; and that's Saddam. All this romanticism approximately given them their "freedom" on the cost of the lives of our youthful adult men and ladies interior the provider and ; !!!which "freedom" they have used to "kill and ambush" US and coalition forces should be achieved away with. Edit: I edited the third line from the backside, so each and all of the bleeding hearts right here can supply me some extra, or ; each and all of the "thumbs down" they could like. actuality all hurts ; would not it?
2016-10-19 06:43:16 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The USA couldn't wait to hang him. He would have made a great witness against our leaders (Rummy, especially). Did you know they couldn't even wait until he had his civil trial right in the same court. So I guess his estate is settled since he was not allowed to defend himself. So much for fairness and justice.
2006-12-31 01:53:43 · answer #5 · answered by anya_mystica 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I would have sentenced him to 1000 Years at hard labor! (to rebuild Iraq).Each year on their independence day he would be caged and carted around the city for citizens to spit on. After his death - His mummyfied remains would still be carted around. This would be done to show what happens to cruel dictators. After 1000 years - who cares!
2006-12-31 01:57:37 · answer #6 · answered by Earl 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The USA wanted him for questioning about Al Qaida....not to put him on trial. We are all told he was on trial so that we would have Faith in our government. He was interregated as to the whereabouts of Al-Qaida.....we're just all lied to to make us feel calm....
2006-12-31 02:03:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's offensive but it depends who sponsored it. American government sponsored it, so it will never create consternation in the west.
2006-12-31 01:57:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Too bad it wasn't done in 1991.
2006-12-31 01:59:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
People will move on, nobody clings to a dead person for long.
2006-12-31 01:51:02 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋