English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Do u think scientists search for similar conditions as earth in other planets of our solar panel is reasonable?What i believe is there is no point in searching 4 similar conditions and decide whether there is life life or not in dose planets.Coz any other planet in our solar panel hasnt got the same distance from earth.Life in our solar panel depends on the distance from the sun.Earth is in a distance where it can have life based on oxeygon and water due to the distance from sun!

Therefore dont u feel that scientists search 4 oxeygon and water in other planets has no point?Coz of the face dat da distance is different there cant be life based on oxeygon!Maybe there are creatures who inhale a different gas and cannot be seen by the visible region of light which is 400nm-700nm!Maybe there r lives which dun need any gas at all!

oxeygon is required by our type of creatures who live in earth!So scientists shud think abt dis and do different experiments which has no deal with oxeygon!

2006-12-31 00:04:29 · 9 answers · asked by SOAD_ROX 2 in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

well mathematician
i've got to tell u i didnt talk abt other stars and solar panels.I'm talking only abt our solar system.I knw that there is life in other galaxies and solar panels.U completely misunderstood me!What im talking is about our solar panel.The attempts to seek for life in other planets of our solar panel by using the equivalent contditions of our earth is stupid as far as i believe.Because whatever the conditions(oxeygon) and other molecular structures are independent to earth due to the fact the earth is at the most appropriate distance to the sun to have life based on the conditions that we have now!

2006-12-31 01:34:38 · update #1

9 answers

ya u r right to think this cuz i wonder abt it too........
but no, i dont think ther is a possibility of of any life on any other planet in our solar system but ther CAN b life on some planet in some other solar system

2006-12-31 01:49:39 · answer #1 · answered by Deranged Soul.. 2 · 0 0

OK, I have to say it, it's solar system, not solar panel. A panel is what is on a satellite to get solar energy.

Mathematician answered your question quite well, you're saying it's stupid to look for earth-like life, and he's telling you that scientists are not doing that, they understand that life can use many different forms of energy and are looking for all the ones they know about.

We have to pick SOMETHING to search for. Sure maybe some life uses mercury, some use iodine, some use silicon. So do we search for every single element in the list? We know the temps of the planets and the moons, so we search for elements that would be liquid or gas on those surfaces. If there is more than expected, that may be a sign of life.

2006-12-31 02:38:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Many different things are wrong in this.

First of all, oxygen is not needed for all life on earth. In fact, the earliest life would probably have regarded oxygen as a deadly poison. It wasn't until 2 billion years after life got started on earth that oxygen started being produced in larger quantities (by living things). The reason we look for molecular oxygen is that we know of no way for it to be produced in larger quantities except by living things. It is not the only way of dececting life, but if oxygen is found in large quantities, life almost certainly exists.

The actual conditions that life requires are fairly open. Even on earth, life occurs in some pretty nasty environments: from hot sulpher springs to deep sea vents, to antarctic snows. There are bacteria even today that are poisoned by oxygen. There are some that use sulpher instead. Some just do glycolysis. Given what we know about life here on earth, the range of possibilities for life elsewhere is actually rather large. Some form of liquid water seems to be a requirement, but one thing we are finding is that this may not be rare, even in our solar system.

Next, we are finding planets around other stars on a regular basis now. The relevant distance for these planets is that to their host star, not the distance to our sun. Many stars will have habitable zones around them which could support liquid water and then, potentially, life.

Of course there may be other chemistries for life. There may be life based on ammonia as a solvent rather than life. We don't know if DNA or proteins are going to be a basis for life anywhere else. But based on what we know now, this is the place to start. As we learn more, perhaps we can expand our search.

2006-12-31 00:53:44 · answer #3 · answered by mathematician 7 · 1 0

Actually, I clean my solar panel regularly, so I don't think life can exist on it since I use a strong cleaning soultion.


And, since your questions is not really clear on other points, I am not sure what you are talking about.

(Scientist shud think abt dis?. Does that mean that Scientist should think abut distances? And what the heck is oxeygon)

If you ask a question using to many abbervations and misspelling it makes it to hard to understand. Try rephrasing and using the spell check.

2006-12-31 03:34:23 · answer #4 · answered by Walking Man 6 · 0 0

millions of years ago conditions similar to earth might have existed in other planets and life similar to that in earth could have been there though they must be extinct by now. you may be able to find fossils of those things in those planets. also sun is not the sole source of energy. even in earth there are such creatures living in deep oceans dependent only on geothermal energy. we know that certain planets (or their satellites) have ice covered surface. may be conditions similar to deep oceanic regions exist under that ice surface which can sustain life similar to that in earth. as far as we know complex chemical molecules needed for whatever form of life should contain elements like carbon, hydrogen, oxygen and nitrogen as main constituents(only carbon can form long connected chains to form gigantic molecules and the other elements can form strong bonds with the carbon chains). so we need to search for only these elements to search for complex molecules(life)

2006-12-31 03:33:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Planets in other solar system in the Univese are ever changing, no time to grow in any physical created cell growth..( On a costant asteroid re-structure )

2006-12-31 04:23:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

We can't be the only living beings out of all the 1000's of galaxies in the universe that just seems like a waste of space to me.

2006-12-31 00:12:27 · answer #7 · answered by one10soldier 6 · 0 1

Who is conscious? i'm particular they does not have instructed us in the journey that they did not favor to because it would want to reason chaos. I dont imagine so in my opinion besides the actual incontrovertible truth that i imagine they could have evidence of existence.

2016-12-01 08:57:40 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

sir it is not that we are only living being in this universe.there are more than 1 crore planets having live.nasa also knows about it as there are many ufos roaming around.so dont think that we are alone.

2006-12-31 00:51:21 · answer #9 · answered by kws 1 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers