The British Foreign Secretary has said in respect of the execution of Saddam Hussein:
"We have made our position very clear to the Iraqi authorities, but we respect their decision as that of a sovereign nation."
Few would question that Iraq, as a sovereign nation, has the right to do what they have done however much we might disagree with it. But surely Iraq was also a "sovereign nation" when America and Britain decided to invade their country and overthrow Saddam in 2003? How is Iraq a "Sovereign Nation" whose rights we accept now but was not a "Sovereign Nation" three years ago?
2006-12-29
23:09:32
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics