Surely the girls who wernt fit, i.e. the mingers would be extinct???
2006-12-29 22:38:23 · 32 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Psychology
wow, so many sausage jockeys taking this sooo seriously!!!!
2006-12-29 23:00:10 · update #1
wow, so many sausage jockeys taking this sooo seriously!!!!
2006-12-29 23:00:20 · update #2
ha ha ha ha
I like your thinking.
Beats me???
2006-12-29 22:40:32 · answer #1 · answered by The Oracle 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
wow this is so wrong on so many levels.
ugly girls are not born fat
beauty really is in the eye of the beholder - i.e. really you classifying anyone as ugly is false
before technology and civilization where man could sustain food production, the fatter people had a higher chance of surviving drought and winter conditions.
maybe even survival of the fittest really is false if you want to apply it to this day and age
maybe you are just a little person
2006-12-29 22:52:28 · answer #2 · answered by Akshun 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Same reason many men are ugly dim witted bigots (sorry guys). Why is it that ugly men feel they can critse women who don't live up to their high satndards of apperance when they themselves look like the back of a bus? At least us women have intelligence, and sensitivity. Besides i don't believe anyone is truly ugly, as beuty is subjective.
Franky i would be suprised if you ever find a girlfriend i will suprised, remember women can think men are ugly too. And by the sounds of it you are not attracting the kind of woman you want. Which would they are out of your league, i.e. you ugly!
2006-12-29 22:56:35 · answer #3 · answered by Emma L 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Even in evolutionary terms, beauty is often in the eye of the beholder. Many centuries ago it was considered far sexier for a woman to be plump--it signified that she was well-fed and thus from a well-off family. Even conceptions of facial beauty change--if you look at older statues or even movies from as recently as the 1950s the women just don't look as hot to us, though the reason for this isnt as clear. Also, sometimes evolution just flops a bit...diversity is caused partly by randomness--if evolution didn't "try" new things, we'd never have gotten out of the primordial ooze.
2006-12-29 22:44:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
They may have become fat and ugly after having children, in which case evolution does not come into it.
Poor health does not enter into it. I work at a maternity hospital. Some very unhealthy looking women are having a lot of children.
.
2006-12-29 22:53:39 · answer #5 · answered by Terracinese 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
By fittest it means those best equipped to survive, ie the strongest, NOTHING to do with how good they look, and anyway, even the best looking female and male can, and do, produce offspring that do not match up to them in any way, it's all a matter of genetics, even you will carry genes that could create an ulgly child.
2006-12-29 22:49:01 · answer #6 · answered by mike-from-spain 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
fat and ugly... beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Nature does not judge on looks, but on health. Skinny girls tend not to be the most fertile of people. Nature likes breeders.
Nowadays, survival of the fittest no longer really applies, we have it easy in the Western world, don't we.
2006-12-29 22:42:32 · answer #7 · answered by Balaboo 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It is just a perception. Fat and ugly girls maybe seen as beautiful to a lot of people . Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
2006-12-29 22:56:04 · answer #8 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because there are fat, ugly guys to breed with them, creating more fat, ugly people. And physical fitness really isn't a necessity for survival anymore.
2006-12-29 22:41:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It is no longer true for us pampered humans, an abundance of food along with the removal of most risks in life has made us fat and lazy. As for ugly anyone can have kids as welfare will support you.
2006-12-29 22:48:54 · answer #10 · answered by ffordcash 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
For the same reason there are so many fat and ugly , sexist, big headed men sorry erase that last word and replace with boys.
2006-12-30 01:55:13 · answer #11 · answered by Social Science Lady 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋