why did you voluntarily enlist?, you could work as a civilian emt here in america!
2006-12-29 22:33:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Do they need to be their for our sake or Iraq's sake? I say take them out and risk the civil war and increased terrorist threat. It costs too much to leave them there and I am tired of hearing people complain about it. Doesn't matter when we leave, the violence will erupt whether it happens now or later. The Iraqi army is close to 400,000 strong so give them a chance to regulate their own country.
2006-12-30 06:34:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wish you well. As can be consistant with that, personally make as few enemies as possible among the Iraqi people and as many friends as possible. Americans collectively are NOT the same as the illegally installed UNelected Dumbya Coup.
2006-12-30 13:18:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by rhino9joe 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Should we have gone in? NO. Can we just pull out? NO. What kind of a message would that send to the rest of the world. That we will pull out even after we said we wouldn't.
2006-12-30 06:32:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by masterhowie069 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Gee, isn't that supposed to be "unamerican" and "against our troops" to talk like that? January 2009 can't come soon enough.
2006-12-30 06:32:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
do our troops need to be in iraq
yes, who else is going to make bushes friends billions every year
2006-12-30 06:43:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by a_l_m_o_s_t_famous 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
ofcourse they need to be in iraq...unless you and every american is willing to give up their luxorious way of life! cheap gas...etc
2006-12-30 06:34:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mo 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes but u must remember that all of them will go to hell soon
2006-12-30 06:32:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by cat c 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Should not be there, never should have been there.
2006-12-30 06:35:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by ball_courtney 5
·
0⤊
0⤋