English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-12-29 21:36:29 · 19 answers · asked by may_minu 3 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

Well my answer to own questions is ......... money with out kids is useless and kids without money are difficult .......so both are equally important ..............but still i want to know your opinions please thanx for all ur replies and opinions

2006-12-29 23:02:48 · update #1

19 answers

Personally, I would say kids. No amount of money could EVER replace the joy of your kids. Although, money is a necessity in life.

2006-12-29 21:38:20 · answer #1 · answered by Baby Doll. 4 · 0 0

A strange question! Is it a choice? I suppose kids are pretty expensive & you'd be better off financially without them, of course if someone wants kids I don't think this argument would be enough to dissuade them.

I happen to be someone who doesn't want children. It's not that I choose money over children it's that I don't want the responsibility of creating & caring for another human the rest of my life. There is too much else that I want to do artistically. My paintings & songs are my babies. I don't feel the need to have a child. I never have. I think you have to be really sure & really want children if you're going to have them. It shouldn't just be something you do because of your age or societal pressure etc.

Obviously family is more important than money. But I don't want children. I think it's an evil world to bring kids into anyway and I think there are already too many people in the world.

2006-12-29 21:51:59 · answer #2 · answered by amp 6 · 0 0

It is personal preference.

I would personally rather have money, as I cannot stand being responsible for someone else, especially a child. I cannot justify spending thousands of dollars on a little thing that doesnt appreciate anything I did for it until it is 20 and I really get nothing in return except "love and affection". I can find that through a woman or a close friend. and like someone already stated, at the rate we are headed, the world is facing overpopulation, so why contribute to a growing crisis?

2006-12-29 21:48:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It depends on what you want out of life and what stage you're at.. I'm 20 and at university, so money is a bigger need to me than children - a child right now would be a disaster for me! But in a few years from now when I have a stable income and more life exprience then maybe kids will be more important - I'd definately like to have some a bit later on. Of course when they grow old enough to know what they want, you'll need to have enough cash to support them!

2006-12-30 01:44:09 · answer #4 · answered by Error Child 4 · 0 0

Money.

1. Money can buy you kids (adopt).
2. Kids can come and go as well.
3. You can save the world with money (including starving children).
4. Instead of having kids support you when you're retired, why not just have money? Cut the middleman.
5. Having kids hurts if you're a woman.
6. Population's too large.

2006-12-29 21:46:18 · answer #5 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

That would depend on what makes one happier. I, for instance, never want to have children, so children are less important than money to me. But I also am not merely concerned with the acquisition of money. However, it is very important once one has children to take the child's well-being into consideration. Giving the child attention is important, but so is feeding, clothing, and providing a stable living environment for him, all of which take money.

2006-12-29 21:49:53 · answer #6 · answered by wolfchild168 2 · 0 0

Money is important, but kids are more important to me. I'm not much of a kid person but I love my kids and I like having a family.

2006-12-29 21:44:09 · answer #7 · answered by ginger 6 · 0 0

I think kids are more important because without then there will never be a future. Money is also important to make a future :-"

2006-12-29 21:38:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Money...you need money to take care of kids. Maybe you don't but I think that would be better for the kids.

2006-12-29 23:11:18 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Aren't they both a part of life? Can't they both have positive and negative affects in reality? I think if you said which one would I love more I think it would have to be my kids, but which one is more important can vary.

2006-12-29 21:48:52 · answer #10 · answered by Friend 6 · 0 0

It wasn't extremely substantial to me. even inspite of the shown fact that while i desperate ideal ask my spouse to marry me then i became additionally arranged to settle for her 2 young little ones besides. At that factor it became certainly the main serious area to our relationship to strengthen via making them experience like i became a father parent and that i cared for them as though they have been my own little ones.

2016-10-19 05:09:31 · answer #11 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers