English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

ddam and he used it to kill the Kurdish people in some towns in Iraq) and other western countries feel relief with their guilty conscience owing to the fact that they created and fed him with everything he needed when he was fighting Iran?Moreover,the same thing occured in the case of Usame Bin Ladin who was clearly supported by
American governments against Soviet İnvasion in Afghanistan Don't you ever think all the big countries supporting Saddam once must bear the portion of all the murders Saddam comitted?

2006-12-29 20:40:11 · 3 answers · asked by edd 3 in News & Events Current Events

3 answers

I absolutely agree that other governments must be held accountable. Let's start with the US, since it was the Reagan administration that put him in power in the first place! Some of those people still have positions of of power in the current administration.

Until there is justice for all, there shall be justice for none!

2006-12-29 20:46:02 · answer #1 · answered by Notmai Rheelnaim 2 · 0 0

Yes and no. You cant chase every rabbit down its hole. I personally and morally think they should all be held accountable, but in practice its a different story. If we started on Germany, then a logical progression would be to hold America responsible for its blatant disregeard for indivual and sovereign dignity and human/civil rights. Every nation has its political sins, but when it all comes down to it there needs to be a balance of responsibilty and sanctions. The problems lie in mainstream media and there tendency to paint america and their allies as the righteous and moral police. The truth needs to be heard and judged on an individual and politically sovereign basis. my 2c

2006-12-29 20:50:18 · answer #2 · answered by genghismctavish 1 · 0 0

Rumsfeld decrease back to Baghdad in late March 1984. through this time, the U.S. had publicly condemned Iraq's chemical weapons use, pointing out, "america has concluded that the available information. US replaced into unbiased in the Iran-Iraq wars and formally issued a public condemnation on March 5. It pronounced, "on the same time as condemning Iraq's chemical weapons use" Later in the month, the State branch briefed the clicking on its determination to enhance controls on the export of chemical weapons precursors to Iran and Iraq, consistent with intelligence and media comments that precursors provided to Iraq originated in Western countries. in the early Nineteen Eighties the US did supply Iraq with 'twin-use' chemical components (the same chemical components that are used to make insecticides are used to make nerve gasoline). america banned the sale of those form of chemical components whilst Saddam's chemical weapons application replaced into got here across. there's a reliable standard mythology that the united statesprovided weapons to Iraq. it particularly is surely debunked through troublesome those human beings claiming this to perceive one US made weapon in the Iraqi inventory.

2016-12-15 11:23:33 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers