English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If he still had a son alive would he be looked at as a threat?

2006-12-29 20:06:02 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

12 answers

His daughters are women

In the Arabic World unfortunately Women have very few rights until they are married, and precious few even then.

His sons were completely out of control, and yes... I have actually SEEN and walked through the places his two sons took 12~16 year old girls and pleasured them..... and buried them out back after they were done with them. We found the mass graves, some barely buried to begin with.

2006-12-29 20:45:03 · answer #1 · answered by wolf560 5 · 0 0

His sons were a threat. They were just as evil as he was.

His daughters I think aren't felt as a threat because their father had their husbands killed in front of them and their children. I don't think they held Saddam in the same regard after he had 40 members of his immediate family executed.

2006-12-30 05:14:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

They are well settled in their life and they are only related to SADDAM as his daughters.
They are living Peacefully, and they do not want interference.

So, It is a good Sign, They are not Threat.
Regarding If he had Son, it is not at all important that
AS FATHER-AS SON.
We have seen very different characters in the deference of Generation.
So, It is the Individual person who could be studied not the whole family be treated as GUILTY.

ENJOY NEW YEAR.

2006-12-30 06:27:10 · answer #3 · answered by AVANISH JI 5 · 0 0

Many women in the middle east, especially under Saddam's rule, are considered material goods to be possessed by men. Really they are no threat because they would never have been taught to be anything. Sad really.

2006-12-30 04:11:23 · answer #4 · answered by Memnoch 4 · 0 1

Now you are after his daughter's why don't you tell the American Goverment to wipe out the entire sunni population in Iraq they were and are with Saddam

2006-12-30 05:00:58 · answer #5 · answered by akband 4 · 0 0

Saddam's son, Uday Hussein, was a threat.

And a rapist.

2006-12-30 04:16:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

It has to do with their culture. in Iraq women cant have any power during Saddam's rule. As far as i understand women in Iraq were not much better off then being a slave. and depending on how you look at it and your beliefs women were slaves over there.

2006-12-30 04:12:39 · answer #7 · answered by Joe_Tx 2 · 0 1

I only know of one daughter, and she helped the U.S. in the war.
Beside what did any of the daughters do that is considered wrong. Technically in America we don't judge the action of one family member to carry over to another, technically.

2006-12-30 04:16:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

one, they aren't even considered people in their own culture. but honestly it's because the ony notable female in middle eastern history (as a ruler) was esther. And besides, we americans tend to think that women are far too delicate for that kind of thing; why do you think female serial killers are such a shock!?

2006-12-30 04:14:42 · answer #9 · answered by sweetesssounds 2 · 0 1

yopur question shows just how stupid women are.
only threat a woman can be is biting your nuts too hard or sleeping with your brother

2006-12-30 06:20:46 · answer #10 · answered by a_l_m_o_s_t_famous 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers