He was contracted to do three, but legal problems concerning ownership of the Bond series stalled everything, for six years. He decided to resign from the role in April of 1994, which opened the door for Pierce Brosnan, once everything was back on track.
2006-12-29 19:53:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Timothy Dalton was more like the Bond in the books than any actor who ever played the role.
2006-12-30 05:28:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by turkey 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
The 80s change into only a foul time for Bond to bypass gritty as action videos were frequently extreme and stupid very like the Roger Moore days so it did not artwork, Brosnan change into the unique decision to prevail Moore so that they were chuffed to bypass lower back to that sort even as he grew to change into accessible yet after the Bourne videos it change into sparkling Bond mandatory to be as a lot as date. both Dalton movie look a lot extra effective at the moment by association with Craig and Dalton has had a strong sufficient occupation.
2016-12-01 08:06:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
because the Living Daylights was Bond Mediocraty at its best and Liscense to Kill, in my opinion, was the absolute worst Bond movie ever.
Add those two together with the fact that Dalton wasn't liked as Bond and really wasn't that great at it, I think the better question would be why did Lazanby only have one movie when Dalton (and Brosnon for that matter) get 2 or more?
2006-12-29 19:55:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by daughters_a_wookie 4
·
0⤊
5⤋
Hello! Someone in my facebook group shared this page so I came to look it over. I'm definitely loving the information. I am book-marking and will be tweeting it to my followers!
2016-08-23 13:59:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The studio probably looked at the box office take. He was good though, I wished they had kept him instead of Pierce.
2006-12-29 20:10:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by elthe3rd 4
·
2⤊
3⤋
Was going to ask this too
2016-08-08 22:43:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Probably because he was the worst Bond, ever.
2006-12-29 19:53:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by Poopy 6
·
2⤊
5⤋