According to one news report that I have read,Saddam's 2 half brothers are in custody and waiting in line for the gallows. The report I read states that they didn't want to hang his 2 brothers until after some kind of "Holiday" that the executioners are celebrating,and they didn't want to hang them on the same day as Saddam. The hangman in charge of this operation wanted Saddam to have his own "special day".
I think this whole thing is pretty sickening,and I am ashamed as an American that we had something to do with this,finding him,and putting him on trial here in the U.S. ,now the U.S. is trying to distance themselves from this barbaric murderous ordeal even though we still have the death penalty here in some states in the U.S. ,but not all.
2006-12-29 23:43:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Dfirefox 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
After saddam, Abhit D. How do you like it. This is nothing abhi, a part of the drama you see during the life moments. Tomorrow you would also be invited to hand, either yourself or by the so-called democrazy our your nation. a periodical ruler would merely gain his selfish interest. We need not a periodical parliament, but a strong unalterable Law and Order. Get it on.
2006-12-29 21:05:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Big Avatar 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
it is named interests, the undeniable fact that States did no longer attack Saddam as we talk, because of the fact this might help extra vicious enemies like Iran, additionally, you won't be able to eliminate all the leaders as we talk as quickly as they make errors. because of the fact human beings such as you will scream out and bash on the west. Saddam became no longer the perfect in 1983, Saddam became a independent best pal with states. merely states supported him against Iran, and so, Arabs completed... then Saddam invaded Kuwait which became helping him the main... how do you clarify communists cooperate with Islamists? like Iran that usually talk out and kill communists, yet have solid ties with Cuba and N. Korea, why?
2016-11-25 00:24:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Anyone who gets in the way. Saddam blew it by thumbing his nose at his masters.
2006-12-29 18:30:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by Reba K 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
USA's eyes are on North Korea and Iran in the near future and Libya in the long term
2007-01-02 01:56:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by KNOWALL 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Next is 2007-2009, watch, alot will happen in 2007
2006-12-29 18:33:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by bri n 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Maybe the elusive OBL (Osama Bin-Laden)
Or Start on North Korea...who knows?
2006-12-29 18:31:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
saddam is not first casualty in US game plan and he can not be last one. US may not kill every one like him physically. But killing people like India also psychologically and emotionally to suit its own vested interests.
2006-12-30 03:21:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by naren 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Perhaps Bush. Or wait... no, not possible because he's American and decides whom to invade and rule and all! Na, I'm kidding... Don't know! It'd be interesting to know, but I wish no one death!
2006-12-29 18:31:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by ♡♥ sHaNu ♥♡ 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Hmmmm, is anyone even looking for that Osama guy? You know, the one who threw airplanes at our buildings? I wonder....
2006-12-29 18:31:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by sueflower 6
·
0⤊
1⤋