Was this too harsh?
2006-12-29 17:55:45 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
I do. His trial and execution were a circus. His crimes were serious, and should have been tried by a legitimate body, not this kangaroo court. For all the people saying "look at how he treated his victims," does that make you proud that we reduced ourselves to his level? Not me.
2006-12-29 18:10:20 · answer #1 · answered by Edward K 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Treated shabbily/harshly? You have to be kidding. He was treated far better than he has ever treated a fellow human being.
The man should have been shot the moment they dug him out of his rat hole.
2006-12-30 02:09:53 · answer #2 · answered by wunderkind 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I feel his victims were treated too harshly, shabbily and unjustly.....
2006-12-30 01:59:06 · answer #3 · answered by CassandraM 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
m.b. WHAT THE HELL DOES BEING CANADIAN HAVE TO DO WITH ANYTHING - He was treated properly! Quick and precise! This whole Saddam thing has been going on way too long!
2006-12-30 02:08:47 · answer #4 · answered by Silver Surfer 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
YOU MUST BE KIDDING???? TO HARSH???? Just ask all the people he imprisoned and tortured and killed,not to mention the way he treated women.Did you know that one of his sons had a "rape squad"???? Wake up and smell the cofee!!!
2006-12-30 02:03:30 · answer #5 · answered by Mr Bellows 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
No. He was treated quite well compared to how he had people tortured to death in prisons. He allowed his sons to take any girl off the sidewalk, force her to party with them and rape them. They even found films that the sons had made with their friends. His hanging was quick. Torture and rape is not.
2006-12-30 02:08:08 · answer #6 · answered by Alletery 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
There are those who say he was, and people with such opinions usually have a pretty good point. Too bad that nobody who cared could do anything about it. Besides, I simply think executing people is for orks, not humans. It's the 21st century, for crying out loud!
I feel cheated. Where is our superior morality. Killing people is for Neanderthals (and even they were pretty civilized, I hear).
2006-12-30 02:14:36 · answer #7 · answered by Tahini Classic 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
NO SADDAM WAS NOT TREATED UNJUSTLY, I THINK HE GOT MORE THEN HE DESERVED. I THINK IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN A PUBLIC HANGING.
2006-12-30 02:08:53 · answer #8 · answered by rosebud98663 1 · 3⤊ 0⤋
If he got what he deserved, it would have been much slower and more painful...the same way as he treated his victims.
2006-12-30 07:30:18 · answer #9 · answered by J D 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I mean if u look at it, I never knew of a famous person go to trial so quickly, so yea it seems as if something's up with the way he was treated.
2006-12-30 02:00:11 · answer #10 · answered by blkdude4u02a 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋