2006-12-29 17:44:23 · 30 answers · asked by Amir 1 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
he should be hanged. bush intentions is good??? i don't think so. he never care for the middle east, the iraqis or the victims of terrorism. he just want to expend his power in the middle east. you say bush did not commit murder??? what he did is murder!!! if he really care for the world peace or the middle east he should stop the israelis cruelty towards the palestines. but what he did is endorsing the israelis war. why??? because israelis are friends!!! because he will benefit nothing from the palestines!!! Bush, Blair and the israelis regime are no different with saddam
2006-12-29 17:58:17 · answer #1 · answered by SoulDeSeman 1 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Because Bush is not guilty of mass murder. Bush saved Iraq from an evil murdering dictator, and it seems that people like you love mass murder or else you would appreciate Bush for stopping Saddam from murdering more muslims.
In Iraq, muslims kill each other far more than Americans kill muslims. I guess you want Americans gone so muslims can murder each other in peace...
2006-12-30 14:02:12 · answer #2 · answered by mountainclass 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Your group knows better that any American that Saddam has killed more than 148 people. Lets get real, it's like a MILLION or more. They keep finding more and more mass graves.
I take offense to some of the 116 questions you have asked. Some things going on in your head.
First you state you are a NON-MUSLIM.
Next question you say you are a MUSLIM.
In your 116 questions you are spreading propaganda as fast as you can.
Your group ought to go back and read your questions, all 116 of them.
Your brain must be spinning. Get a life.
2006-12-30 03:00:32 · answer #3 · answered by DeeJay 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because Bush has a powerful military to defend himself with and the only reason Saddam wasn't hanged 20 years ago was because he had a large military along with western support. And that's all you need. You can be the baddest man on the Earth, if you have money, power and the protection of America & west, you have the freedom to do whatever you want. But don't worry, Bush will get his. Maybe not on this world but don't forget that death isn't the end. There's the other world that Bush has to worry about.
PS. To all you saying "Saddam killed more than 148". He was charged with killing 148, not thousands. Not saying that he didn't do it but that's what the asker is trying to say.
2006-12-30 01:57:47 · answer #4 · answered by LaissezFaire 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Saddam killed a whole lot more people than just 148..... that's kinda stupid.
And even, just for the sake of argument, he only DID kill 148 people, we excecute people for lots less than that.
Bush mass-murdering muslims?
It's called WAR. Get used to it. It happens, and is going to happen more and more frequently as the world ends.
There are some times when it is necessary to go to war with an enemy country for the safety of your own.
There's a quote by Winston Churchill
"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last."
2006-12-30 01:59:23 · answer #5 · answered by John S 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Bush did not hand out orders to kill Muslims and he has nothing against Muslims, it is Saddam that killed people based on their religion. Why do you want to turn this into something that it is not. Saddam killed way more than 148 people, what rock have you been hiding under to peak out of every once in a while to say something off base?
To the answer down below saying he was only charged with that amount of killings... just for a little info., had he not been executed today he was expected to stand another trial for other murders. It was not intended to be left off at just these murders that he died for.
2006-12-30 01:52:00 · answer #6 · answered by 2007 5 · 6⤊ 4⤋
I agree with some of the responses, well those that say that you are undereducated for such a dumb question...I mean it seems like that...So Saddam is dead now will that bring back all those that he killed in one way or another...Well no...Killing Bush will not bring peace anywhere..There are other ways of solving those type of problems....And as a country we seem to need the research and the education to find that answer...To keep it short and simple killing won't solve killing...
2006-12-30 01:58:56 · answer #7 · answered by Maria A 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Bush hasn't mass murdered any Muslims.
They're doing a pretty good job by themselves.
I deal with displaced Sunnis all the time because of the Mahdi Militia so please don't come on here and blow smoke for us.
Muslims are the biggest killer of Muslims on Earth.
2006-12-30 13:34:14 · answer #8 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
bush is not mass-murdering muslims, and to say so is ignorant. I'm not a fan of bush either- but honestly do some research and get some logic.
also, in the court systems you can only be convicted of somethign if there's proof beyond a doubt. Saddam killed thousands of people, but there's just not enough proof to back up every single person he killed. again, do some research before you form generalized opinions
2006-12-30 01:52:03 · answer #9 · answered by opi 4 · 6⤊ 5⤋
When did Bush ever "mass-murder" any muslims? Just because we're at war in Iraq doesn't mean he's bent on killing the muslims. Seriously, read up on some world news and stop saying stupid things like this.
2006-12-30 01:52:27 · answer #10 · answered by glimlach 5 · 6⤊ 4⤋