English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i honestly think it is. Tell me what do you think.

2006-12-29 17:39:03 · 30 answers · asked by tasya.orlova 2 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

30 answers

I honestly believe that Bush stuck his nose where it didn't belong. If he was executed and it was all initiated by the Iraqi's then yea I would agree but it wasn't. It was heavily influenced by the Americans. Bush is trying to turn another country into the "American way". These people have a different culture and a different way of life. Can you imagine if every country was ran like the states? Where's the diversity in that?

2006-12-29 17:47:36 · answer #1 · answered by summer_p1b1x4 2 · 2 0

Yes it is wrong because two wrongs don't make a right. Nevertheless, it's not man's place to kill or judge others. By all means we all know that George Bush had a big part in this too, because Saddam threatened George Bush's father. So in this matter our President George Bush is sole responsible for the death of Saddam. We all know that what Saddam had done was wrong, but man was also wrong for killing him. That OK because when Jesus comes man will have to answer to Jesus for that.

2006-12-29 17:56:11 · answer #2 · answered by George 4 · 1 0

He did alot of awful things in his time and perhaps instead of being executed he should of been made to suffer locked away somewhere to live with his conscience. By hanging Saddam, America especially have technically put a noose around their own neck as this is bound to spark some more trouble from his long-term supporters hellbent on revenge.

2006-12-29 19:44:42 · answer #3 · answered by CitrusLime 2 · 0 0

No. It is NOT wrong to execute Saddam or anyone else convicted of crimes that warrant this form of final punishment. I am a supporter of the death penalty. Indeed, I am appreciative of the quick appeal process in Iraq, especially in light of the extremely lengthy appeal process here in the United States. Saddam was given a relatively fair trial and it was effectively demonstrated that he was directly responsible for killing 148 individuals without just cause. I don't believe that Saddam's death will change anything on the ground and we need a new war strategy that involves a very quick removal of American forces.

2006-12-29 17:47:58 · answer #4 · answered by DeMarcus J 2 · 0 2

No. It is in keeping with the law. However, I think it is a very sad commentary on the human condition. We as human being should be much better that we are. Each and everyone of us should be people of peace and non-violence. It is a pity that any human could be like Saddam and a pity that we have no other way to deal with evil except to do more of the same. Personally I shed a tear when I heard of the execution. Not a tear for him, but for us all.

2006-12-29 17:45:09 · answer #5 · answered by tonks_op 7 · 0 2

Absolutely wrong to execute Saddam. They should have made him the mayor of North Carolina, or Presdient of Russia. Are you kidding? This bloody bastard killed more that 2 million people...innocent women and kids...with gas no less. He was a crook and a murderer. What would you do with a mass murderer? They treated him too well.

2006-12-29 18:15:58 · answer #6 · answered by wunderkind 4 · 0 0

I agree - it just doesn't feel right. I mean Bush went in there claiming Iraq was a part of 9/11 and had WMDs (against the UN). It was proven that he didn't have WMDs and that he had nothing to do with 9/11 and we are still there. Now the US is forcing a quick execution before the new Democrat Senators and Congressmen can be sworn in. It seems underhanded and deceitful and I think it undermines our war on terror when we start to act like terrorists.

Peace!

2006-12-29 17:43:30 · answer #7 · answered by carole 7 · 1 1

It wasn't wrong at all.

He is guilty for living a very high life while his countrymen starved. His son was a rapist who rode through the country and raped whomever he wished, and Saddam did nothing.

If you dared speak against the government, your family could expect you or your family member to be swinging from a lightpost early in the morrning. Disappearances, murders, ALL done by the "police" and "government officials".

Thousands of people died under Saddam's regime. I do believe that there is a definate amount of justice out there.

And to the poster who wrote "his people chose him", actually, no, they did not. That's what a dictator IS.

The sheer brutality and violence he lashed out on countless human beings, and the torture he allowed to commence, and the mercy he NEVER gave are all excellent reasons to off this jerk.

Iraqi Americans are celebrating, and they are celebrating for a reason. Go ask them why - they know what either they, or family member, have suffered under Husein.

2006-12-29 17:48:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

I think right or wrong is very subjective. I would have to lean toward legal or illegal. If his execution followed the ruling law of the land, then no - It wasn't wrong. Sometimes our personal beliefs have to give way to the collective will of the people.

And, on a personal level - while it does sadden me that any life has to be taken - I do agree that allowing him to continue to live after all the crimes he committed would have been a mistake and most likely led to further deaths and unrest. Even his death may yet still do that.

This is kind of what I consider a 'No Win' situation. In the long run, it will most likely be better for Iraq that he is gone. But, along the way, we still sacrifice a piece of our souls in the process.

2006-12-29 17:45:57 · answer #9 · answered by bionicbookworm 5 · 0 2

Saddam Hussein change into performed merely for revenge. First, President Bush Junior, affectionately favourite as "W" to his legions of followers, had a own grudge hostile to Saddam for disrespecting his father, George W. Bush. even as he might want to not legally placed a settlement out on the chief of yet another usa, Junior knew that if we received the conflict and they grew to change into Saddam, and his relatives, over to the human beings of Iraq that he might want to performed. After a lengthy time period of abuse, the human beings were thirsty for blood, and his lack of life change into guaranteed, one way or yet another.

2016-12-01 08:04:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers