You've hit the nail on the head there. Saddam Hussein used to taunt Dubya's father about his penis size and George Bush senior could never accept that Saddam had a bigger penis than him. Well, Dubya doesn't know what a penis is. Sure he gets it out to relieve himself and shakes it off before putting it away. He also thrusts it into his wife from time to time: she seems to like it and, hell, it's not so bad for him either. But he doesn't understand the true implications of this powerful weapon (unlike Bill Clinton). Well that's not too important, the important thing is that Saddam upset his Dad and my God did he pay.
So, hopefully, the answer to your question is yes.
2006-12-29 18:35:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
President Bush has been returned by the American people to run the U.S.A. Surely this is a problem for those that voted him in, the majority?
As an outsider all I recognise is the fact that America supported Saddam and bin Leiden and gave sanctuary to both at various times.
Using this information as a basis, it doesn't look good for this country either right now.
Ah well! What goes around comes around.
Happy 2007.
2006-12-29 18:54:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
there is not any doubt in my innovations Saddam Hussein grow to be a bloody tyrant and that he deserved to be further to justice for his crimes. besides the undeniable fact that, the call to objective him by utilising an Iraqi court docket whilst the conflict grow to be ongoing contraptions an extremely undesirable precedent. in case you pick to instill values of democracy, justice, transparency, due technique, etc..., etc..., that's no longer the thank you to try this. It smacks of the styles of regimes South human beings got here to loathe and loathe. yet of direction, the Bush administration in simple terms pretends to care approximately democratic values, in simple terms like it lied approximately each thing else. If the assumption grow to be to make certain fairness, justice and the international rule of regulation, Saddam Hussein could have been exceeded over to the international Human Rights Tribunal in Brussels. There could have been little question of the legitimacy of the lawsuits there. we've a thought in properly-prevalent democracies that proclaims it truly is not in simple terms conflicts of interests which could be prevented, however the visual allure of conflicts of pastime besides. That is going double for democracies that are actually not yet prevalent.
2016-10-28 17:10:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No Dick or Condeleza way! George W has got a duty to get Korea sorted, before he retires or is retired.
Please God! Have mercy on this world!
Shame, he and Saddam couldn't have done the hangmans jerk together.
What a star duet that would be!
2006-12-29 17:47:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by sistablu...Maat 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Do you actually know what the Oedipus complex is? It has nothing to do with the execution of Sadam. It wasnt George Bush senior who was executed
2006-12-29 17:44:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by Greg 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
Unfortunately, no. He is a meglomaniacal egocentric freak who will continue to alienate the allies of the USA until his *** gets kicked out of the White House.
2006-12-29 17:36:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Don't be silly. Saddam didn't look anything like Barbara Bush!
2006-12-29 17:39:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by mcfifi 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Could you define Oedipus Complex for me? I am not getting your point.......
2006-12-29 17:55:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Wouldn't think so hes American
2006-12-29 17:46:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
probably not.... im expecting a few more mushrrom clouds befor that ends....
-eric
2006-12-29 18:33:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by Senorpoppadookie 1
·
0⤊
0⤋