2006-12-29 16:54:12 · 12 answers · asked by supun l 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
condie in a hot minute!
2006-12-29 16:56:05 · answer #1 · answered by Buk (Fey) 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The Clinton's had Timothy Mc Veigh and endless different terrorist attacks hostile to the U.S. even as they were in workplace Bush has had none after 9/11.i might want to chosen Bush merely because of that. Hillary had performed not something except Piggyback to her Political Prominence putting on her husbands shoulders.
2016-12-01 08:01:53 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Condi is about as incompetent and delusional as Bush, so I'd vote for her.
She could help permanently destroy the Republican Party.
2006-12-29 17:39:10 · answer #3 · answered by bettysdad 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
clintons are both professional corrupt criminals and always will be. So that leaves two. It is my right as a US citizen to vote in private, so why should I tell you. But guess you see the two I would not vote for.
2006-12-29 16:59:11 · answer #4 · answered by m c 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
George Bush can not run again.
2006-12-29 16:56:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Clinton a million times over...we already know where
Shrub and Condi have gotten us: Royally screwed.
2006-12-29 17:01:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Pretty sad selection to choose from!
how about somebody that actually listens for a change?
2006-12-29 16:59:49 · answer #7 · answered by DB 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Those are not good choices...I would not vote. That nice looking lawyer if running again this round. I'd vote for him.
2006-12-29 17:00:17 · answer #8 · answered by Countess Bathory 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hillary all the way!
2006-12-29 17:22:21 · answer #9 · answered by ball_courtney 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would go with Rice.
2006-12-29 16:56:58 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋