English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-12-29 16:05:24 · 18 answers · asked by goodgirl 1 in News & Events Current Events

18 answers

Bush, at least he is not a terrorist. right or wrong ways, he goes forward peace. Saddam used his people to be as rich as he was, and the people were in hunger.
Would you really have a Saddam as president?
Not me.

2006-12-29 16:17:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I don't like either one and it is best that Saddam is dead now, but I have to pick Bush. Then again this probably wouldn't have happened if Gore was president.

2006-12-30 00:11:08 · answer #2 · answered by Vandy 1 · 0 0

Jimmy Carter of course.

2006-12-30 00:09:03 · answer #3 · answered by debi_0712 5 · 1 0

Isn't that obvious? Bush of course.

2006-12-30 00:07:49 · answer #4 · answered by SingGirl 4 · 2 0

Neither ,Bush is far more dangerous

2006-12-30 00:12:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

saddam now that hes dead

2006-12-30 00:16:47 · answer #6 · answered by ourmadhouse2005 2 · 0 0

Neither one...and I did not vote for either one of them too.

2006-12-30 00:08:27 · answer #7 · answered by tigerlily_catmom 7 · 2 1

Neither.

2006-12-30 00:07:32 · answer #8 · answered by DavidNH 6 · 1 1

I LIKE BUSH.

2006-12-30 00:14:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

neither they both are evil

2006-12-30 00:17:06 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers