English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Bush ignored all warnings of 9/11 and allowed the terrorists to execute 4000 Americans.

Bush invaded Iraq on lies and killed 3000 US soldiers and 100,000 Iraqi civilians.

Bush created an unstable Iraq on the verge of a civil war which will claim millions of more lives and thousands of US soldier lives.

So when is Bush's hanging?

2006-12-29 16:04:43 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

17 answers

Your supporting evidence is flawed Saddam has killed far more people than the war on Iraq. He did so by killing his own people, including but in now way limited to the Kurds, Iranians, Kuwaiti citizens. But all that wants to be swept under the rug.

Just remember it is IRAQ who tried, convicted and executed Saddam, not the US. And it was Clinton who allowed Americans to be vulnerable to terrorist attack it was on his watch that security measures and warnings were ignored. Bush didn't allow the terrorists to do anything.

Why don't you turn your outrage onto the women awaiting stoning in Muslim countries for self defense? Saddam had it easy compaired to the fate many Muslim women are waiting for. Including a 19 year woman who killed a man in SELF DEFENSE when she was 17 after he stabbed her and tried to rape her 14 year old neice. Where is the outrage in this? Instead you focus on 'Americans' while turning a blind eye to the violence of others.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazanin_Mahabad_Fatehi

2006-12-29 16:33:14 · answer #1 · answered by Wicked Good 6 · 1 0

Fallacy#1:
If Bush want to execute 4,000 Americans, why would he just limit it to 4,000? Why not 100,000 at a football game or NASCAR event?

Fallacy#2:
Lies? And your proof is what, again...? For your drug-clouded mind, there were 6 other countries who's intelligence also showed that Saddam had WMD's. 6 other nations! It mus've been a GLOBAL CONSPIRICY!!! Yeah, that's the ticket. And John Kerry even said Saddam had WMD's, and he is on the Senate Intelligence Committee!

Fallacy#3:
3000 soldiers who volunteered, many AFTER 9-11. They felt the need to defend us against terrorists, unlike you who would probably rather hunker down and try to "talk" them out of it, just like Neville Chamberlain tried to do with Hitler in 1939. That worked out pretty well, didn't it?

(And, by the way, we lost 3,000 troops in the first 30 MINUTES of D-Day)

Fallacy#4:
Bush didn't kill 100,000 Iraqis. Insurgents and terrorists from Iran and Syria did, you idiot! Gawwwwd...

Fallacy#5:
Civil war? Not hardly. There have been 3 FREE elections for the first time in over 25 years there. The people formed a government in just a year. Our Constitution wasn't done until 1786, 10 years after we declared our independence.

Bush will be hanging, all right. Hangin' at my place sippin' on some brewskis while we dig on some Bar-B-Q

Get a life and be informed. Get out once in a while. It might do you some good...

2006-12-29 16:21:58 · answer #2 · answered by Big Mack 4 · 3 1

Saddam killed hundreds of thousands if not millions of people. He raped, tortured and mutilated many more. While I feel that President Bush knowingly used skewed data to justify his actions, let's remember that Saddam was playing games with the weapon ispectors by restricting their access to some areas. As far as the terrorists being "allowed" to kill Americans alot of the blame for that can be laid on the average American who like myself love my freedom so much that we are willing to risk attack rather than surrender our liberties. The day may come when we have less freedom in this country but I doubt it. I think we will vote to restrict access to our country rather than live like prisoners. God bless America, if you don't feel that way we won't miss you when you emigrate.

2006-12-29 16:16:04 · answer #3 · answered by Shawn M 3 · 2 0

When you dream, because Bush was voted in and Saddom was a mass killer. Use your left side of your brian, the right for some reason is ice cream. So have a few scoops and get a life. Maybe you can count all of the homeless people in the US to help. Or build a house for the poor. Maybe, just maybe, you can ummm.. join the Army and get there and do something.

2006-12-29 16:10:46 · answer #4 · answered by LoganXXX 2 · 4 0

I doubt that Bush is a Hero..Saddam Deserves 2 Die.Why don't U take his place then no joke get a life

2006-12-29 16:13:51 · answer #5 · answered by sugarbdp1 6 · 0 0

They will be hanging a portrait of Bush in the White House, I'm sure, after his tenure has run out.

The fact that he is an honorable president makes this fact that much more palatable.

2006-12-29 16:17:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

YOU don't know ANY of that for sure. All you know is what hype they put on TV and say in newspapers! Saddam got what he deserved. What goes around, comes around.

2006-12-29 16:14:15 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 4 0

I disagree with your question. Bush doesn't deserve hanging, he is a respectful president and he'll be remembered as a good man in history.

2006-12-29 16:08:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

No not pales...2 million were killed in the 35 years that Saddam was in power..I am very glad for one that we have two term limits or else Bush would break that shameful record!

2006-12-29 16:07:37 · answer #9 · answered by tigerlily_catmom 7 · 1 5

"on the verge of a civil war"??
The verge was months ago.

2006-12-29 16:18:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers