2006-12-29 16:04:18 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Because they're so open-minded their brains fell out.
2006-12-29 16:06:11 · answer #1 · answered by not g 1 · 2⤊ 4⤋
I disagree , ,please, you as a Con-servitive are being much too
modest. Rape-publicans are every bit as capable, nay , superior to' most garden variety Dim-o-crats ,when it comes to identifying
the greater of two evils. The Rapes generally put their money on them , after all. Saddam Hussein was the darling of the Rapes
until he became uncooperative and had to go. Currently the Rapes are in league with the former godless commie Chinese and Saudi Royal Family -good choices! I don't give the Dumocrats enough credit- they wouldn't have the balls or stomach for such dealings , at least not directly. But , again the Rapes naturally have a keener nose for a buck, yen, mark or just plain raw power and will seek it out wherever it slinks. Do liberals prefer the greater of two evils-?
If they seriously thought about ,perhaps , why , yes, I think most libs would prefer to get more evil for their tax dollar.
We 'mericians like a bargain after all.
In an informal survey , most liberals preferred evil '' A'' only
23.5% of the time, as compared with a whopping 64.3% approval rating by the average conservative . ( 3% margin of error)
Hardly a preference by the liberals , at least by statistical standards.
So , perhaps we , liberal and conservatives alike can , in the spirit of bi-partisan cooperation , work together to make this evil selection process easier and more , (shudder)-democratic.
I propose that the selection of available evils be placed upon the ballot in the next national election. If your prefer evil madman X, place your stylus on the e-ballot or you can choose to have Diebold vote for you. Don't know whom to repress next? We'll tell you.
So , please , chin up Bucky , I have faith in your abilities-
it's our Freedom of choice-
''Choose the greater evil America ''(tm) Campaign 2007
It's the Americian way.
2006-12-30 00:58:07 · answer #2 · answered by mindfeederz 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Why do conservatives insist on electing oppressive dictators? Saddam was a CONSERVATIVE in every sense of the word and he wasn't labeled a dictator until he messed with the oil supply in 1991...before that he was your Republican cronies best friend.
2006-12-30 00:07:50 · answer #3 · answered by Perry L 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
This question doesn't make a whole lot of sense considering most situations involving "liberals" and "conservatives" are lesser-of-two-evils scenarios
2006-12-30 00:19:25 · answer #4 · answered by Solomon Q. Hooker 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Exactly what and who do you refer to?
Conservatives have always coddled right-wing dictators and looked the other way at their crimes. . . it was Reagan/Bush and Cheney and Rumsfeld in their cabinet who favored Saddam Hussein and armed and funded him?
I don'[t recall them being particularly liberal but you can correct me if you wish.
Noriega? a few African warlords? that lovely man from Chile?
2006-12-30 00:09:13 · answer #5 · answered by SWMynx 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
What is it with Repulicans on this board who constantly make stuff up and outright lie?
2006-12-30 00:07:38 · answer #6 · answered by sundayhighway 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
nice play on words!!! bush is the lesser of 2 evils?
2006-12-30 00:06:59 · answer #7 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Why do Republicans always generalize?
2006-12-30 00:06:40 · answer #8 · answered by renee 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Good question. I do not know why people support Bush.
2006-12-30 00:08:09 · answer #9 · answered by Doom Lord 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Because it goes against everything republican, or conservative. They live for it. (I am not saying they are simple-minded, I am just thinking it.)
2006-12-30 00:08:59 · answer #10 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋