Who you think killed more innocent People,Saddam Hussein,or Georg W. Bush?

Question

I tink its George W.Bush,what do you think?

Answer 1

All most a tie.

Answer 2

Saddam did.

George is a great president and he's doing what needs to be done.

It's VERY obvious you haven't spoken to ANY troops that have been in Iraq. I live on a military post, and my husband is Army.
Out of all the people I know, and some I don't since the war started only 1 says we should not be there. I've asked over 100 soldiers.

So why don't you stop listening the the libs who also don't know what they are talking about and actually speak with people who've been there before you make judgements such as this.

Answer 3

Saddam Hussein

Answer 4

Saddam, no question about it.

Now since they have mastered hanging people, they can go to the prison they have there, and take one at time, after about 10 hangings, the ones still in there will start to talk and give up some information that will help end the war.. Then hang them anyways.

Answer 5

Think again. Saddam is responsible for nearly 2 million deaths. This information comes from the Iraqi ambassador to the U.N.

Answer 6

Bush is just as bad as Hussein ... thanks to his personal agenda, international and domestic policies, many innocent lives have been lost.


P.S. to zoom whatever your name is - are you freaking kidding me? Yeah, US may be a "superpower" - read bully on the playground, but have you read any history books? The US took out Nazi Germany? Umm, do you know when WW2 started? 1939. When did US really get involved? Not until 1941. And why? B/C Japan bombed Pearl Harbour - it was a direct, personal attack that got the US really P.O.d. And do you have any idea how many other, non-American countries were involved in WW? Try Canada, Britian and Russia who all allied as well against taking out Hitler. And another thing - have you not heard of a little group called the United Nations - a group of countries that came together to try and end war? Funny how the UN did not endorse Bush invading Iraq and yet he did so anyway, under the guise of uncovering "weapons of mass destruction". Well, there certainly is mass destruction in Iraq and billions of dollars are going to be needed to restore ruined infrastructure, but where are the weapons that were supposed to be uncovered? Ohh that's right, there aren't any!

And if the US is so great and has so much power for GOOD, then why are so many people living below the poverty line, not able to afford adequate housing, health-care and education or still trying to re-build their lives after being hit by a natural disasters??

Answer 7

Saddam. He killed at least in the hundreds of thousands. Bush hasn't killed any.

Answer 8

Saddam still beats out Bush. I'm not sure by how much. All I want is peace and a good leader for those people, and all our troops to come safe at home. But hey, I don't have a magic solution. Humans will be humans.

Answer 9

Let the world take notice. USA is the only Superpower left, and can do anything to any nation or their leader. The only difference is WE USE OUR POWER FOR GOOD. We only take out genocidal dictators that are a threat to world peace. We took out Nazi German, Fascist Italy, Imperial Japan in WWII, the EVIL worldwide Communist Empire....so Iran and N. Korea watch out---- you are next!!

We could easily use our power to take over other nations and their wealth but we do not. That proves the USA is the GOOD in the age old battle of GOOD vs. BAD. The proof is in the pudding or the USA.....every race and nationality want to immigrate to the USA.

Answer 10

CG Jung wrote a e book referred to as "job's answer to God", which solutions a appropriate question.... He additionally wrote "the subject of Evil" because of the fact this became some thing of an *subject* for him in my opinion.... Anywho, Psychologically, you could no longer have good w/o Evil, yet early Xianity became in reality monotheistic, i.e., Jesus redeemed the duality.... for some reason, i do no longer extremely fathom, devil re-entered the image and wreaked havoc on women human beings and *heretics* for the time of the Inquisition, which of direction magically disappeared all the way with the aid of itself later... in spite of the undeniable fact that, job's seize 22 situation in a nutshell became that he envisioned help from God to shop him from God. except of direction, you think of he became by some ability in charge himself for his tribulations, yet that would perfect be responded with the aid of New-Agers and that total Chosing Your Incarnation thangy. became Hitler in charge? have been the Germans in charge? The Jews???? Or do you think of it is obtainable that the different answer might desire to be the two, if not extra valid, such because of the fact the respression of the twin nature of guy and the "Collective subconscious"???? Or, reincarnation???? or in step with threat an vast New international Order Conspiracy with roots going back to *previous Europe* to borrow a word? A parting theory: "we are conditioned no longer in basic terms with the aid of the previous, yet with the aid of the destiny, it is sketched out in us long in the past and gradually evolves out persons. ("Analytical Psychology and coaching," 1924)"

Answer 11

I agree 100%! Wait, no I thought you said: Don't you think I'm an idiot?