i mean he was evil and all that but wich is worse?
Dying or spending the rest of your life in a isolated cell
2006-12-29 15:46:51 · 24 answers · asked by bob 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
i understand that people whould prefer him dead and theyd feel better about it but to be in a cell with bread and water as your only food and nobody to talk to and nothing to do but sit and wait for death to come it just seems a hell of alot worse that death
2006-12-29 16:08:52 · update #1
death is a life lesson he ignored hundreds of times over...if deservance by ignorance of death is a graphic intimate demonstration, so be it,..if the lesson is one of ruthless-ness, let justice decide,... if the lesson satisfies vengance, then, we are wrong to kill.
2006-12-29 16:00:17 · answer #1 · answered by olddogwatchin 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was judged by the Iraqi court system. According to their laws, a death sentence must be carried within 30 days of it being made. He had an appeal, but the verdict and the sentence were upheld. It is how the Iraqi judicial system works, a mixture of democracy and Shari'a law.
2006-12-29 15:56:12 · answer #2 · answered by cpl3043usmc 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont think of there are various governments who could desire to place their palms on their hearts and say they have by no skill commited any incorrect doings!! i understand Sadam has accomplished lots incorrect yet i don't have faith he could recieve the loss of life penalty for various motives. One reason being that i think the loss of life penalty is incorrect!! no person has the suited suited to take yet another persons existence for any reason no be counted if legalized or no longer!! homicide is homicide and easily God can provide existence or take it away. i think of a greater effective punishment for Sadam may well be to condemn him to existence in detention center with perplexing hard paintings. Or make him slave for the folk he oppressed. If this guy is carried out then in some peoples eyes he may well be seen as a martyr or a hero. additionally there has been to many situations the place harmless human beings have been carried out just to recieve a pardon later while that's located out they have been infact harmless of the crime they have been carried out for. What solid is a pardon once you're lifeless? (i'm no longer asserting this applys to Sadam). Why have been the folk who have been in touch with sentencing those harmless human beings to loss of life then no longer charged with homicide as that's what that's. homicide is a pre -contemplated act and those human beings knew they have been going to end someones existence. How might you experience if this grow to be your father or mother or brother or sister or son or daughter and worse to then locate out years later they have been harmless? You hear on the information daily of harmless human beings being released from detention center after a misscarriage of justice. What if that they had recieved the loss of life penalty?
2016-10-28 17:03:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
His death gives closure to many victims and gives courage to the people of Iraq who feared his return. Did he deserve to die? Of course he did. Islamic law is not as forgiving as most Christian coutries and that is the rule under which he was charged and convicted. I personally see no reason anyone should have to support someone who has no remorse for their actions and can never be rehabilitated or trusted in society.
2006-12-29 16:02:42 · answer #4 · answered by Shawn M 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
death
2006-12-29 15:52:10 · answer #5 · answered by glduke2003 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bob, the problem is that political winds change, and he wouldn't have remained in that cell all his life. And how can we keep the respect of all the other evil word leaders of we don't make an example once in awhile? Besides, in this case he REALLY, REALLY DID deserve it.
2006-12-29 15:52:02 · answer #6 · answered by Dorothy and Toto 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Death.... BUT only after he has had a few months of having the stuffing kicked out of him a few times a day. I am sure there are a million & one people that would like to get a kick in.
2006-12-29 15:50:39 · answer #7 · answered by MrBret 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Dying was better over all.
It gave closure to the families of the people he murdered. It showed him that he wasn't be protected by some thing. It made ALOT of Iraqis feel better. They were terrified of him even when he was locked up. Alot have said, they won't feel safe until they see proof he is dead.
He is rotting in hell now. So he is being eternally punished (Even people I know who don't believe in God believe that Saddam will be punished.)
2006-12-29 15:50:21 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
DEATH! You Anti-American Socialist.
2006-12-30 01:41:47 · answer #9 · answered by FRANKFUSS 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes. Did the thousands of innocent people he killed deserve to die and do you realize how much it would have cost to feed and shelter him for the rest of his life.
2006-12-29 15:53:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋