It's actually a different verb. "To hang" someone in order to kill them becomes "hanged" in the past tense, whereas "to hang" something on a hook, for example, becomes "hung." Just an idiosyncrasy of the English language.
2006-12-29 15:57:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by J 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Perhaps those with influence over the English language didn't want people to get the death sentence confused with a "hung jury", or think that the deceased convict was well-endowed. ;)
Why is it this way? You have me stumped. :)
2006-12-29 16:01:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by Dave of the Hill People 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
OMG I am an American and completely agree with the constitution and our gov.
I know Hussein was judged and convicted by a non- American court, only captured by our forces but, I still feel uneasy about his hanging, maybe because it sounds barbaric, death by hanging... I feel sorry for him, I feel sorry for a human being dying such death...am I crazy?
2006-12-29 15:56:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
A person was hanged.
People were hung.
2006-12-29 15:49:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
it's the necon biased media. It's filled with rednecks that can barely read.
2006-12-29 15:49:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You would have to ask an English Professor..But I love the question..its one of those..YEAH! WHY IS THAT.
2006-12-29 15:49:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
singular....... hanged,plural........ hung
2006-12-29 15:57:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by Im Just Blessed 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
you can use both can't you i think lol
2006-12-29 16:12:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by ausblue 7
·
0⤊
0⤋