Justice for Saddam and Bush ?
If on the one hand, they can justify hanging former Iraqi dictator
Saddam Hussein, for his role in 148 killings in 1982, what should the
world do about 2,991 American Soldiers, and the estimated 50,000
innocent Iraqi civilians killed by the invasion of Iraq because someone
made the simple mistake that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction ?
Then again did not this all begin with 9-11 and the 2,973 innocent
lives lost in a terrorist action attributed to Bin Ladin, not Saddam
Hussein; or have we forgotten that ?
2006-12-29 15:40:34 · 7 answers · asked by Caesar J. B. Squitti 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Why do we put all the blame on the leaders...who misled Bush to believe Iraq had weapons of mass destuction...besides the devil...?
2006-12-29 15:52:59 · update #1
Correction: 600k+ Iraqi civilians have died.
In a 'perfect' world, the American ppl would have been outraged from day one of the Iraqi invasion... obviously justice will not be served on Bush until Judgment Day.
Quite frankly, I am of the mind-frame that many foreign leaders have committed atrocities... even us when we used the atom bomb on Hiroshima and Nag...
I truly believe we have no right to be the world's police nor the world's judge, jury and executioner.
2006-12-29 15:42:46 · answer #1 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 10⤊ 6⤋
Umm, Saddam's sufferers went previous 148 killings. He has been killing human beings because of the fact the 1950's. Bush hasn't ordered bombs to be placed on toddlers, women human beings raped... he became on no account partial to Hitler... you could no longer even evaluate those 2. If Bush have been any subject like Saddam, you does no longer be here suitable now for even asserting that. So happily you have Bush in potential.
2016-11-25 00:12:14 · answer #2 · answered by helmkamp 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Saddam was created so this would happen . Donald rumsfeld was about from the beginning of Saddam's up rise this was all planed the first gulf war then this one . the USA have benefited the most from Saddam being a tyrant . if he was a nice guy then they would have no excuse to invade Iraq and make bases there.in the USA for decades a minority of people have all the power and they get more power full from one administration to another look at Cheney and rumsfeld they have been pulling the strings for over 35 years now.so they can plan things for the next fifty years creat more saddams and then deal with them and profit more.
2006-12-29 15:56:03 · answer #3 · answered by rocco s 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
One is just as guilty as the other,only US went over there looking for trouble under the orders of Bush,All our military should have been looking for Bin Ladin who came here looking for trouble and we have a right to defend.
2006-12-29 15:48:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Saddam kill over a millions peoples in his rein as president of Iraq
2006-12-29 15:43:42 · answer #5 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
By going to the wars, american capitalists can sell more weapons
2006-12-30 02:59:27 · answer #6 · answered by JAMES 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
There WILL be justice - Bush will burn in hell along side of Saddam and bin Laden.
2006-12-29 15:47:07 · answer #7 · answered by sudonym x 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋