Hanging actually kills you instantly if the noose is made properly. If we had killed him, he would have been made a martyr. Having his own people do it was smart. All I have to say about Bush is that I respect the office, not the man.
2006-12-29 15:55:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Tish 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
148 is not the number of dead in all: "At his death, he was in the midst of a second trial, charged with genocide and other crimes for a 1987-88 military crackdown that killed an estimated 180,000 Kurds in northern Iraq." I haven't read much on Saddam Hussain, but I know that there are MANY dead because of him. I have no opinion on his execution.
2006-12-29 15:55:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by yowhatdoyouwant 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
saddam should have been put to death more humanely. Either that or he should have gotten life in prison. 148 dead is no way comparable to the nazi genocides of the 1940's! Anyone who says he got what he deserved fails to realize that the US is gonna pay with the blood of our soldiers. By the way, I am a blue blooded american, military brat. so no one reading this better think I am a hippy or a commie or anything like that!
2006-12-29 15:45:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by psychotick 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Heavy is the pinnacle that wears the crown. interior the 4th century BC, for example what form of happiness, wealth and delivery dropped at kings and princes Dionysius, the tyrant of Syracuse placed Damocles, his courtier at an costly unfold table with a sword suspended over his head via a single horse hair. that's mentioned as the ; "Sword of Damocles". this may well be a factor of background. ability is attained and used and for this reason reversal occurs. Locking up the disposed chief in reformatory does him extra injustice than a speedy loss of life. not that I agree that Saddam Hussain would desire to have been hanged, yet conserving him alive after having lost his throne, could have been a destiny worse than loss of life. Now a minimum of to a pair component of the worldwide he has died a martyr's loss of life - an excellent loss of life - and that for this reason to them Bush could be deemed the tyrant - and his loss of life could be remembered in background having fought to the dignity of God.
2016-10-19 04:58:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It will complicate the things more.It was decided too quickly with out giving a thought for the implications.One thing that has not been learned yet by Americans is that Iraqi's are blood thirsty people by nature.America should keep its interest in mind rather than of Nouri Al Maliki and his party.
2006-12-29 15:54:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by Dr.O 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well I hate it when anyone dies. Even bad people.
But there are differnet sides of me about his death
1) He should have stayed in jail so he thinks about what he did.
2) I think Prezindent Bush killed many people. Like the people in Iraq. Why doesnt he get executed??
2006-12-29 15:49:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by Kancho 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
1he killed people in evn worse ways .2 I think it is going good so far in iraq.3 I agree with the president.
2006-12-29 15:43:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
live by the sword, die by the sword. and eye for an eye.
P.S. Maybe Psychotik, blue-blooded, military brat a-s-s should go over to IRAQ and fight. What the hell are you still doing here in America?
2006-12-29 15:49:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by D M 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
YES, he should have been executed. Maybe this will help with the war.
2006-12-29 15:47:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He was a brutal monster and he deserved to die. Hanging was too good for him.
2006-12-29 16:34:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋