English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

11 answers

They're banking on it. Liberals are willing to lose the whole war on terror if it would discredit their political opponents. The more I look at the two groups, the more they look like they are working together.

Islamofascists would try to drive American troops from the Middle East, and liberals would try to bring them home. Criticism of Islam is illegal under sharia law, and liberals would try to make it impossible here.

Terrorists would seek a repeat of 9/11, and liberals would oppose the Patriot Act. Al Qaeda would use public libraries to avoid detection by Internet sleuths, and liberals would make people crazy with fear that Bush would find out what books they were checking out. Palestinians would blow up pizza parlors, and universities would divest from companies doing business in Israel.

Iran would stone adulterers and homosexuals, and Hollywood would mock uptight Republicans. Islamic immigrants would commit honor killings, and feminists would accuse conservatives of sexism. Saudi Arabia would prohibit Christianity and Judaism, and the ACLU would drive them from public life in the United States. Insurgents would blow up American soldiers as they handed out candy to Iraqi children, and Democratic senators would liken our armed forces to Nazis.

Terrorist sympathizers would concoct American and Israeli atrocities, and the world press would faithfully report them. Suicide bombers would infiltrate Iraq through Syria, and liberals would denounce the United States invasion. Muslims would brag about their ancestors, and liberals would denigrate ours. Terrorists would kill the just and the unjust alike, and professors would deconstruct the difference between right and wrong.

Islamicists would burn American flags, and liberals would scoff at flag-wavers. Muslims would claim that the Bible is made up of forgeries, and liberals would engage in Higher Criticism. Baathists would disrupt elections in Iraq, and Democrats would declare ours illegitimate. We would uncover mass graves in Iraq, and liberal Democrats would say the war was totally unjustified. Muslims would drive Jews from the Middle East, and liberals would limit their numbers in the academic world with affirmative action.

Islam would spread polygamy, and liberals would undermine the institution of marriage. Al-Qaida would bomb crowded mosques, and liberals would accuse conservatives of Islamophobia. Pakistani terrorists would behead Daniel Pearl, and liberals would accuse conservatives of hostility to freedom of the press. Terrorists in Iraq would behead Nicholas Berg, and his father would blame the President. Insurgents would kill Casey Sheehan, and Cindy Sheehan would accuse George Bush of murder.

I predict that as the "war on terror" drags on, as it will regardless of what happens in Iraq, the left in America will come ever more to resemble foreign jihadists, to the extent even of carrying out suicide bombings and maybe even beheadings. Frustration with the failure of their message to bring about their vision, combined with blind hatred of the existing order will be the trigger, just as it was for the Symbionese Liberation Army and other brutal left wing groups of a few decades earlier.

2006-12-30 13:02:39 · answer #1 · answered by Incorrectly Political 5 · 0 1

No, Osama Bin Laden has wanted Saddam out of power for as long time, so has Iran, the Kurds etc. Al-Quaeda and Bin Laden are quite pleased tonight. Under Saddam they had no access to Iraq. Now.... they are infiltrating with success. Now Bin Laden's dream of an Islamic state triumphing over Saddam's secular Iraq is very real.

The native nsurgencies in Iraq will surely intensify and the violence and death will surely increase, and the Terrorists are very satisfied tonight.

2006-12-29 23:40:50 · answer #2 · answered by Timothy M 5 · 2 0

I assume you mean Liberal as in leftist (like the Democrats), 1st off im not an American, thus I vote for neither party.

2nd it is likely that the death of Saddam is going to cause more problems for the coalition and Iraq.

2006-12-29 23:45:08 · answer #3 · answered by Mike J 5 · 0 0

Neocons: now that Saddam Hussein was executed do you feel safer from his weapons of mass destruction...oh, yeah, there were none

2006-12-29 23:38:27 · answer #4 · answered by cwdc 3 · 3 0

Actually with Saddam out of power, it makes it easier for them to run their operations. So I would say NO. they actually would have less of a reason to be mad at us.

2006-12-29 23:38:12 · answer #5 · answered by Joe K 6 · 1 0

Probably not. They're already plenty mad at us as is. What will do is provide yet another rallying point for recruitment. If your'e a christian conservative you should be familiar with the process of martyrdom. That's what we're making of him.

2006-12-29 23:39:24 · answer #6 · answered by anecdoteman1 2 · 0 0

Definitely.

2006-12-29 23:38:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It will upset the Saddam's loyal fan. They are now wepting for his death. Some will use his death to inspires themself to die for worthless causes while getting revenge for him.

2006-12-29 23:41:51 · answer #8 · answered by codeworx7 3 · 0 0

Emphisis on the second Really? Oh **** they are going to be mad at us.

2006-12-29 23:46:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Sorry, not a liberal.

Now, maybe the insurgents will have nothing left to fight for.

2006-12-29 23:39:12 · answer #10 · answered by LoneStar 4 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers