George W. Bush has murdered 10 times more Iraqis then Saddam Hussein ever did.
2006-12-29 15:26:10 · 32 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
The point is Bush isn't much better than Saddam Hussein. Saddam Hussein was as evil as they come and George Bush is a close second.
2006-12-29 15:35:03 · update #1
Yes, I am wrong I should thank the US military and George W. Bush for protecting my freedom from those vicious Iraqi women and children that he so skillfully blew to peices with smart bombs. Now go watch Fox news.
2006-12-29 15:38:41 · update #2
Anyways...it has been fun. Thank you for the entertainment. I find it fascinating how it hasn't even crossed your mind that I could be from a different country other then your own. I love my country so why would I want to move? I also like the USA it is just the 25% of it's population that idolizes the warmonger Bush that I don't care for.
2006-12-29 16:08:13 · update #3
Bush of course, and it's a shame he won't face the same fate.
2006-12-29 15:30:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 5⤋
Did anyone on here ever see Saddam or Bush murder anyone or is everyone going by what we have been told by the media and politicians? Look at the argument that is going on now about something no one really knows the answer to. Only God has the right to judge. This world forgot that a long time ago and that is more sad than people answering this question in many different ways and thinking that they are all right.
2006-12-29 15:39:19 · answer #2 · answered by Kristofer 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The last minutes of Saddam Hussein
Saddam (as the noose is put around his neck): Ya Allah (Oh God).
Someone in the audience: Mercy be on those who pray for Mohammed and the household of Mohammed (Everyone repeats the prayer, including Saddam)
Executioner and two people in the audience: And hasten his return (the Mehdi), curse his enemy and grant victory to his son, Muqtada, Muqtada, Muqtada! (This is a common Sadrist chant.)
Saddam (smirking): Muqtada?
NSA Muwafaq Al-Rubai'i: To Hell!
Saddam: (laughing)
Prosecutor Munqidh Al-Far'awn: Please, no.
Muwafaq Al-Rubi'i: Long live Mohammed Baqir Al-Sadr!
Someone in the audience: To Hell!
Saddam (solemnly recites the Shahada prayer): I witness that there is no god but Allah, and that Mohammed is the messenger of Allah.
I witness that there is no god but Allah, and that Mohammed is the- (trap door is opened).
Audience: Prayers for Mohammed and the household of Mohammed.
Someone: The tyrant has fell. May Allah's curse be upon him.
Someone: No. No. Stay back.
Someone: Leave him for 8 minutes. Don't take him down.
Someone: Everyone. Stay back.
2007-01-01 06:57:48 · answer #3 · answered by Ivri_Anokhi 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is some one you love in the military? I can see why you would ask this question. Saddam's are defiantly more brutal and direct. Even though I think George needs to go. Enough of our military have given their lives for people over there who don't give a damn about us and would rather see us die than help them.
2006-12-29 15:38:18 · answer #4 · answered by jweh8 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
OK I am sorry but you are an idiot, and this does not even deserve a response, but I just couldn't help my self. Again there is a difference between murder and volunteering to go into battle, just ask any military man or woman you happen to meet. Or maybe you could not possibly bring yourself to talk to one the fine members of our armed forces that so bravely protect you so you can make idiotic comments such as this.
2006-12-29 15:35:02 · answer #5 · answered by former MARINE 1 · 3⤊ 1⤋
If there were blood on Bush's hands, it would also be on the hands of Congress. However, this is not the case.
Also, the tens of thousands of people do not compare to the numbers that are being put out right now.
2006-12-29 15:32:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
One Saddam hanging is worth two in the Bush!
2006-12-29 15:28:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
There were no blood on George W. Bush's hands. Saddam is evil thus he deserves to die. If you have read the things that Saddam did you're regret asking this question.
2006-12-29 15:30:36 · answer #8 · answered by SingGirl 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Well if you count the casualties, Saddam has more blood on his hands, but Bush is catching up to him pretty quickly. Civilians and military dead in Iraq alone comes to over 3000. this doesn't include those dead in Afghanistan.... Bush is by no means an honorable man, and he too, is a butcher od sorts, in my eyes. He is killing his own people in the name of a war, we have no business fighting. In a country we had no business invading. He has blood on his hands because he is furthering his fathers agenda. We had no business in Iraq. Bush is as guilty and will burn in hell, right along with Saddam, be assured of that.
2006-12-29 15:31:25 · answer #9 · answered by mlw6366 3 · 2⤊ 4⤋
It doesn't matter. But it is strange that Hussein is dead but Bush walks. Bush should be dead too. The Western world doesn't need any more murderers like him. We were supposed to be done with that at WW2. Vietnam was a bad mistake, and this most idiotic war is an embarassment.
2006-12-29 15:30:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
Your numbers are wrong. Saddam murdered thousands of people. And who has Bush murdered anyway?
2006-12-29 15:27:51 · answer #11 · answered by Jack 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋