Why did President Bush let liberals into the Pentagon?

Question

Months ago the pentagon released a report on global warming and how it might threaten Americans. This report is false according to leading scientists on the cutting edge.

So, why did President Bush give ammunition to the liberal world at large by authorizing the release of such a report, however flawed or fallacious it may be?

Answer 1

yeah... I don't know... wierd

he let them do the 9-11 report too... it said Saddam didn't do it... crazy...

and he let them do the search for WMD too apparently... they couldn't even find them...

he also apparently let them do his fiscal policy... have you seen the debt...

and we're still in Iraq after Cheney said it would take only six months? did you let the liberals plan the war?

they are apparently everywhere in government... run for your lives!!!

Answer 2

Because its all about money, power and influence when it comes to politics behind the scenes. The liberal/conservative debates are just a way to keep the American public divided and distracted. While we waste our time arguing over who is right, the politicians conspire amongst each other to make themselves rich and to make their friends rich. Whenever you see politicians arguing over a particular issue, the argument is really over who is going to get the most money and influence out of it.

So in times past when the republicans were against the "global warming" issue, it was only because there was no money in it for them. But Bush would allow it because he as well as many of his republican friends are all going to get paid very as a result of the report being released. That's what bi-partisanship is all about. Every time a 25 square mile glacier breaks off of one of the polar caps, Bush can send Haliburton out there to feed and house the workers who are going to attempt to freeze it back together.

They also have scientists on both sides of the fence so that if they need a to substantiate the validity of a particular issue, they can do it very effectively.

Answer 3

First of all, whoever gave you the idea that there is no global warming has provided you with "flawed or fallacious" information. How can you possibly believe that? You're not wondering why many places are having higher and higher temperatures every year? Or the huge ice chunk that just separated? Or how polar bears are now becoming endangered because of the lack of ice? Or the ice island that's slowly getting swallowed into the sea? Or the rising ocean levels? Or the huge glaciers that are starting to melt?
I think you should actually try observing what's going on around you and maybe open your mind, suck it up and admit that you're wrong.
"There is no global warming". BULL$#!7

Answer 4

i think of you’re giving an extremely one-sided view of what occurred. there have been warnings in the time of the months in the past 9/11 of a conceivable Al Qaeda attack. Bush won a PDB on that threat. Bush did truly no longer something. Clinton a minimum of reacted to a PDB approximately conceivable hijackings by utilising having persons meet on the difficulty and project airport warnings. Iraq grow to be supposedly contained or a minimum of that's what Powell and Rice had till now stated. The data that we've shows that Bush and neocons interior the White homestead have been finding for a reason to attack Iraq and Bush grow with a view to make the main 9/11 to accomplish that. there have been no WMDs. The Iraq conflict has been fairly intense priced in terms of lives and hundreds of billions of greenbacks of bigger debt for American taxpayers. interestingly, the invasion of Iraq grow to be planned devoid of understanding or attention of the topics and the folk interior the country and with no plan for occupation. lack of understanding is not any excuse once you're pursuing a preemptive conflict against yet another sovereign united states. in certainty, lack of understanding under such circumstances is against the regulation. Iraq is a chaotic disaster. Iran has been empowered by utilising Bush's movements. the full area can grow to be risky. Bush’s variety of cowboy international kinfolk and phone callings led North Korea to react in sort. They threw out the UN inspectors, restarted the reactor that were close down, fired off missiles, examined their first nuclear weapon and, usually, a great deal progressed their nuclear software. Now, after all of this, Bush makes a decision to objective actual international kinfolk. Bush’s foreign places coverage judgements are abysmally detrimental. Bush could rightfully be blamed for issues that are his fault no be counted if by way of undesirable movements or inactivity.

Answer 5

Decorated Scientist Defects From Belief in Global Warming –
Caps Year of Vindication for Skeptics

http://www.citizenreviewonline.org/oct_2006/18/global_warming.html

Answer 6

A better question would be, how long until Bush goes under investigation?

Even if Global warming is inevitable, you don't know that for a fact. If there is a POSSIBLITY that it is true, and we can slow it down, why not at least try?

Or do you like going outside to take a walk and the air smells like diesel and smoke?

Which do you think is healthier, fresh air or polluted air?

Basically, your whole argument of global warning was invented by rich republicans in the energy business who didn't want to spend a lot of money for technology which could reduce the amount of emissions their factories and equipment gave off.

Answer 7

When Bush ran, he made a promise to the American people, that he would give ear to all, not just republicans, remember he even had some democrats come into his administration, to show UNbias. He said he wanted a mixed administration, of whites, hispanics, blacks, women, and men, and did all he could to represent ALL of America. However, he is a republican, and doesn't buy the Global warming nonsense of the liberals, but he kept his promise to allow them a part in the government he leads. And, I also imagine it is just easier to let liberals make fools of themselves, without him having to take extra unneeded effort. They could do that easily, all by themselves, and they DID!

Answer 8

wow, you're an idiot. He let liberals in because America has 2 major parties: the Democratic Party and the GOPOS (great old party of s***). You can't just exclude the other from the countries affairs. I'll give you a better question: Why did America choose George W. Bush?

Answer 9

First of all, global warming is a real and definite threat. Secondly, the government represents ALL of the people, liberals included.

Answer 10

Global Warming is not a "liberal" idea - it is a fact! Leading scientists mostly agree that it is a real phenomenon. Releasing the report was one of the very few good ideas from this mostly inept President!

Answer 11

There were only a couple of scientist who disagreed with the fact that polution is causing global warming. Bush squashed the report as best he could through one Whitehouse censor.

Pity our grandchildren.