2006-12-29 15:12:56 · 14 answers · asked by michael.bright 1 in Sports ➔ Cricket
At this stage it has to be Symonds. Watson will need to prove he is fit and performing at first class level and Symonds would have to fail from here on.
Good onya "Roy" for making the breakthrough! More power to ya!
Characters are needed and he is one, so long as he achieves results (and the corner has been turned) why change.
5 nil Sydney!!
Then the WORLD CUP!!!
Onya Boys!!
2006-12-29 16:29:28 · answer #1 · answered by kanga 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Can't compare the both as Symond is an experienced player while watson has started his game, for now Symonds is best , But yes shane watson will go very high if he continue his game in this way.
2006-12-29 18:34:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
While Andrew Symonds will be in Test as well as One Day Tm, for the present Shane Watson will be in the One Day Team. Andrew Symonds is a better player than Shane Watson as he is a very experienced players and have proved his credentials whereas Shane Watson has started playing recently.
2006-12-29 15:37:00 · answer #3 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Andrew Symonds, For Sure ! Nothing against Shane Watson, He is Good, But Symonds is On Fire!!
2006-12-29 17:22:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
well Symonds will be in Test as well as ODI team, for the present Shane Watson will be in the ODI Team. Andrew Symonds is a better player than Shane Watson as he is a very experienced players and have proved his credentials whereas Shane Watson has started playing recently, and its too early for shane to be compared with such an experienced player
2006-12-29 15:54:10 · answer #5 · answered by Dj Badboy 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Symonds as he showed in the MCG he is more useful with da bat.
2006-12-29 15:54:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anirudh T 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i think of if Ponting does not want to be captain then Clarke is the perfect it is interior the part. Andrew Symonds confirmed his loss of determination making skills whilst he went out eating and fishing whilst he ought to have been education and in team conferences.
2016-11-25 00:09:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
very tough question ...but i would have 2 go with symonds as he saved australia numerous times in d past ...
who can 4get his 140 in 2003 wc finals
2006-12-29 16:44:14 · answer #8 · answered by amazed !!! 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
of course andrew symonds.
2006-12-29 15:46:16 · answer #9 · answered by freemind 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
symonds! watson is crap he is soooooo overrated, i have watched him closely for his whole career, in state cricket as well, and he is crap. and injury-prone....
2006-12-29 20:19:48 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋