According to the Big Bang theory,and in the timline of big bang,there were some stages and one of the stage is matter domination.
At this time, the densities of non-relativistic matter (atomic nuclei) and relativistic radiation (photons) are equal. The Jeans length, which determines the smallest structures that can form (due to competition between gravitational attraction and pressure effects), begins to fall and perturbations, instead of being wiped out by radiation free-streaming, can begin to grow in amplitude.
i cant tell u exactly at t=0 but i can u this..
hope this helps..
2006-12-29 15:11:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by For peace 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
According to most sources, matter and antimater did not exist at all at t=0. At t +1, that energy became so compact that it fused into protons, electrons, and neutrons. The energy released from this fusion then caused the "Big Bang". It was at this point that some random particles imploded due to their high mass and velocity and created free radical particles of what we know as anti matter. This would then have been just as quickly destroyed by nearby matter to reenter an energetic state.
At this time, the universe would have been about the size of a basketball, if antimatter were created in this process, it would most likely have been at the edges (fastest moving) particles in the energy cloud.
2006-12-29 15:21:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by rawson_wayne 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
At t=0, the big bang had not happened but right after it,(less then 0.00001 nanseconds) matter and antimatter were relatively equal. But of course, as matter was significantly more reactive to heat than antimatter, it gave off more positive radiation than annihilated most of the antimatter. Some antimatter also annihilated matter, but as it is not as reactive to heat and gravity as matter, it did not exist much onger as all were "filled in" by matter and positive radiation.
2006-12-29 17:33:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by thinkmanthink! 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Shortly after the big bang there should have been equal amounts of matter and anti-matter, and there's no known mechanism for separating them. This begs the question of what happened to the anti-matter. The most likely explanation involves an effect called CP-violation (matter and anti-matter don't behave in precisely the same way) but it's not complete yet.
2006-12-29 23:40:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by Iridflare 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think they were oriented just fine
2006-12-29 15:23:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by Johnny Handsome 2
·
0⤊
0⤋