After all, he put some of his victims through a plastic shredder alive !
2006-12-29 14:56:27 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Hey Sahfire....YOU ******* MORON lets hang your ignorant ***
2006-12-29 14:59:29 · update #1
If he was tortured it would make whomever did it no better than him.
2006-12-29 14:59:01 · answer #1 · answered by gottabuylots 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I have to say yes it was too gentle and too quick.
Considering all that he did to so many it was too quick. There are so many that will suffer the rest of their lives for what he did. And those that remember what he did to his own people.
My husband is a disabled veteran from the first gulf war, he has a nueromuscular disease that limits his lung function. He wasn't expected to live through 1999. He isn't eligible for a lung transplant because the nerves that control your lungs are damaged as well. He was there with all the burning of oil, etc. I have to say I'm glad Saddam is gone. But really in so many ways it doesn't make my husband any less sick. It doesn't change that we live knowing the rest of his lungs could shut down. Even the Mayo clinic isn't able to do anything for my husband. Saddam's death can't change that.
Personally I do not believe his is finding himself surrounded by virgins and Allah, I believe he has just now begun to pay for his crimes and will do so for eternity and that is the only comfort I take in his death.
2006-12-29 23:00:34 · answer #2 · answered by Wicked Good 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
He's dead...that's all that counts. I personally don't want to sink to his level. American's shouldn't be known for torturing others or supporting the torturing of others no matter how bad they are. The hanging was just enough. This is something huge in the history of Iraq and of the world for that matter.
2006-12-29 23:05:23 · answer #3 · answered by Ghurricane87 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As I said in another post, Saddam really got off easy. Most dictators in history (think Mussolini) did not get such treatment.
Look at Marie Antoinette, who was beheaded on the streets of Paris with no attempt at a trial.
We could have done him like he did everyone else...cut his head off with a rusty saw and put it on the internet. But we didn't do that. Because we're civilized. Liberals would rather to leave him in power, and let him kill another half million people, than for us to intercede.
2006-12-29 23:02:27 · answer #4 · answered by cirque de lune 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Were you there? Did you witness that yourself? Probably not, but don't let that stand in the way of you celebrating a man being put to death! Enjoy the kill, relish someone's killing, why not buy a DVD of the event and show your kids?
2006-12-29 23:00:16 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Not gentle, but fair for the laws of the country he terrorized
2006-12-29 22:58:53 · answer #6 · answered by Lil' Gay Monster 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
He should have made to suffer a hell on earth in a tiny cell for the remainder of his pathetic life. He got off too easy..
2006-12-29 22:59:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
yes they should have done a pay per kill $1000 for an arrow and you get to shot at him and the money goes to the victims of his crimes
2006-12-29 22:58:38 · answer #8 · answered by iseemen 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
They should have burned him alive, but after they cutoff all his fingers and toes.
2006-12-29 22:59:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
whatever the type of brutal killing to saddam as long as it leads to his death...
2006-12-29 23:00:02 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋