for getting Saddam to the gallows?
2006-12-29 14:47:58 · 14 answers · asked by Dick Richards 3 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
no. liberals will still be against the entire thing.
2006-12-29 14:50:55 · answer #1 · answered by Ryan S 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I won't. Because Saddam would've gone down eventually via sanctions, as both Dems and Repubs have said. The late great Gerald Ford said so himself. Instead, Dubya starts a war on false pretenses, sends our troops into a quagmire short of sufficient support, armor, and planning, and now the death toll for US troops surpasses that of the 9-11 attacks. NOW the President is ready to take a "new course" that signals Rumsfeld had his head up his posterior this whole time, and Iraq has become a rallying cry for terrorist recruitment. Mr. Bush has not solved the problem -- he has only exploited it, increased the risk, and spent our soldiers' lives on a venture without leadership or resolve.
Bush was so fixated on Iraq, he neglected to prepare for the 9-11 attacks, which reminds me...........where is Osama Bin Laden, and why didn't Bush spend more time finding him since he has personally taken responsibility for the worst terrorist attacks on our shores?
2006-12-29 22:51:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Newsflash, Saddam was tried and hanged by the IRAQI government. American troops found him hiding in a hole, but he was tried and hanged by the Iraqi government. It has nothing to do w/ Bush at this point. He was tried in Iraq for crimes against the Iraqi people, and he was hanged according to Iraqi law.
2006-12-29 23:00:20 · answer #3 · answered by mlw6366 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
And this benefits us how? Saddam, while a murderous tyrant, did NOTHING to the US.
If we went after every murderous tyrant in the world, we'd never stop being at war.
2006-12-29 22:55:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Liberals will say, "We are not feeling any safer, it makes no difference.. there are thousands of Saddam Hussein"
2006-12-29 22:58:01 · answer #5 · answered by mystery t 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you kidding me? Just because Bush killed the man that tried to kill his father, a liberal should congratulate him? How about if he actually got off his ranch and visited other 1st world countries about working together on the Middle East? Then, the liberals would definitely thank him.
2006-12-29 22:53:40 · answer #6 · answered by NYCLibrarian 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Why? How has Saddam affected you? And if you're thinking of "the liberation of the Iraqi people," think about this: what country would spend billions upon billions of dollars to "liberate" a country without asking for anything in return? Bush has sent thousands of young men and women to their deaths for his own personal agenda.
2006-12-29 22:51:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
No! How about they catch the man who was responsible for 9/11, Bin Laden. President Bush is one of the worst presidents ever!
2006-12-29 22:52:38 · answer #8 · answered by Cardinals = Greatness 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
for what? This is really a waste of the United States time, go after our real enemy, anyone remember World Trade Center?
2006-12-29 22:58:24 · answer #9 · answered by CW R 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nahh
2006-12-29 22:53:40 · answer #10 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
why would liberals thank george bush... they are a different party for a reason after all...
2006-12-29 22:51:32 · answer #11 · answered by scfitz5 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋