2006-12-29 14:44:29 · 38 answers · asked by doublewidemama 6 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
no, i think is morbid.
2006-12-29 14:45:09 · answer #1 · answered by lola7737 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
The world will insist on proof. Video of the execution, photos of the body, DNA results, etc.
Is it ethical? I'm not so much concerned about that as I am now satisfied he will not feed any more young men into wood chippers or break their legs for losing boxing matches or gas entire villages of women and children or throw men from the top of buildings to watch them bounce or cut the tongues out of young women. "Ethical" and "Saddam" don't really go together that well.
2006-12-29 14:52:52 · answer #2 · answered by AK 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
dont think of of rupert murdoch wouldnt make a pay in accordance to view out of it. Saddam and the executioner would have a WWE type front and pyro would burst off on the same time as the trapdoor is opened. Sky wager ought to prefer to get in on the action through employing working odds on how mny leg kicks he will pull off and there is additionally placed up wonderful diagnosis through employing Richard Keys together with his Gallows-cam and a verbal replace teach approximately it after on E4 with Russell type. of direction pressing the crimson button grants a sparkling length to the viewing experience with ideas availible which is composed of option commentry from **** and Dom and an entire host of interactive information (executioners previous checklist as an celebration) of direction this comes at a fee, on-acceptable of the sky boxoffice fee of 20 quid, there will be rewarding sponsorship deals availible, Nike have already have been given the deal to place a swoosh on the blindfold yet deals are even regardless of the indisputable fact that availible to sponsor the rope and the all significant lever of justice.
2016-12-15 11:14:32 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is nothing ethical about the times and world we live in. Of course they will show them....what a sick world we live in...pedophiles go free and leaders are hung...sick son of a b by our standards but some considered him great and a protector...who really knows what goes on at that level amongst leaders...you think you know but you really don't...wonder if GWB is sh*tting his pants too...he probably should be.
2006-12-29 15:10:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They should put it on pay-per-view. Would make millions. It could be a great spectacle.
No matter how many people say they think it's unethical or cruel...people would still look and the money can go the the families of American soldiers who lost their lives chasing after this guy or to the families he has harmed directly.
2006-12-29 14:48:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I personally think it is. How many executions have they filmed before. Its crazy how people are weary about showing Saddam dying but not some serial killer. I think more people want to see the proof that he really died!
2006-12-29 14:47:07 · answer #6 · answered by wimkim91 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes Definately.
2006-12-29 14:45:55 · answer #7 · answered by Maji 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. I know Saddam did brutal things to people. But why would you want to see someone die ? Wouldn't that just put you on the same level as him.
2006-12-29 14:46:29 · answer #8 · answered by maxie 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
CNN is making a decision as I write this as to whether or not to show them....tune in!! Ethical? Absolutely not....
2006-12-29 14:46:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I'd say yes, only for the fact of people seeing he is dead. I mean come on, some people can't accept that Elvis is dead. I agree with the media; if there is no physical proof, the rumor mill will keep on going We saw footage from McVeigh's execution, you remember that?
2006-12-29 14:47:09 · answer #10 · answered by cirque de lune 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, there are just things that should not be shown, specially if it involves the passing of a person
2006-12-29 14:57:55 · answer #11 · answered by Lil' Gay Monster 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋