2006-12-29 14:35:29 · 19 answers · asked by tbear 5 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
I think it came 26 years too late.
2006-12-29 14:39:38 · update #1
well,he paid the price of his crimes towards humanity.it doesn't take the pain away from those who have suffered by his hand.when he was served the red card i would have liked to see his face for his son would pass those out to people who were to be executed.although im afraid for alot of innocent people because he still has followers.hanging is a terrible way to die.im sure he did not suffer as hard as many people that he terrorized. now he has to answer to the all mighty we all do.
2006-12-29 14:49:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, I've always said: "In order to appreciate what's good in life, you have to have some bad." So there you have it. Without people like Saddam, you wouldn't be able to appreciate people like me. Despite the fact that I am devilish, compared to creeps like Hussein, I'm an angel, aren't I?
2006-12-29 14:45:21 · answer #2 · answered by Mr. Peachy® 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Anyone that doesnt think this is a good thing is just as evil as Saddam.
2006-12-29 14:41:28 · answer #3 · answered by Dick Richards 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think it couldn't have happened to a nicer guy. Hanging was too good for him. That was he was executed as humanely as possible, given his many brutal crimes, showed that the new Iraqi government may be different than its predecessors. It's still too soon to tell, though. (btw, I think his execution came 69 years too late.)
2006-12-29 23:35:04 · answer #4 · answered by Avie 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hes lucky he got caught by a good country.If I had a country I would torture him until hes dead. Saddam sucks!!!
2006-12-29 14:53:32 · answer #5 · answered by xxxx 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think that Saddam was a killer and deserved to die a long time ago. he put millions of people in danger and they never knew what was going to happen next. i think that he deserved to hang and im glad that he did.
2006-12-29 14:47:54 · answer #6 · answered by cathy h 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it's the business of the Iraqi people, and means nothing to us other than his death is going to put our troops in more danger.
2006-12-29 14:43:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's anybody's guess. Your answer is as good as mine. You could have also asked what will happen if the US attacked Irag. And we know the answer now.
2006-12-29 14:42:25 · answer #8 · answered by Germz 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The law of his country determined he was to die for what they decided were his actions. There is nothing more to it. It is not good or bad and it is really none of our busines, it is their country and their laws.
2006-12-29 14:44:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm glad, but am also kinda worried. I just hope that it ends all the strife in Iraq. But i'm afraid that it won't.
2006-12-29 14:38:35 · answer #10 · answered by luvkiss1973 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋