Saddam Hussein has been condemned to death for alleged reprisal on people who tried to kill him.
International observers, and lawyers as well as Human Rights groups all agreed he did not have a fair trial.
Saddam Hussein was due to be tried over the killing of Kurds, using chemical weapons with the help of the United States of America. Do people like Rumsfeld, George Bush senior etc... fear the disturbing evidence that would have come to light during this trial?
See the evidence:
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/
2006-12-29 14:16:53 · 8 answers · asked by s0190331 3 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Whatever.. news reports- HE GONE
2006-12-29 14:18:42 · answer #1 · answered by Mommyk232 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Several sources said Saddam's execution would be videotaped by the Iraqi government, though it wasn't clear whether it would be released to the public or broadcast.
"We will video everything," Iraqi National Security adviser Mouffak al Rubaie told CBS News.
Judging by the Iraqi government's release Tuesday of videotape of the hanging of 13 convicts, it could be a gruesome affair. Meetings were held Thursday in at least two network headquarters over how to handle the potentially graphic images.
ABC and CBS said they wouldn't air the full execution if the video became available.
2006-12-29 14:19:45 · answer #2 · answered by Jared L 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Saddam replaced into allways going to be stumbled directly to blame and positioned to dying, ever when you consider that they caught him they made a determination to discover him to blame and subsequenty execute him, they'd as nicely of shot him the minute they stumbled on him. usa and the U.ok dont understand that the only thank you to run some muslim countries is through a dictatorship, specific saddam saved a great type of the oil funds and must be exceptionally brutal at situations, yet now you have have been given 3 waring factions in Iraq, the Sunni Muslims the Shi'ite Muslims, and the Arabs/Kurds who all decide on the rustic for themselves, so its a three way civil conflict without sign of ending. As merciless because it ought to sound the coalition would as nicely pull out of Iraq and enable them to type it out for themselves(usa can shop the oil fields, thats all they actually needed). I advise on the minute the coalition forces are in basic terms getting in the way, and being shot at. in case you inquire from me saddam replaced into the lesser of two evils, the only reason Bush needed him out replaced into because of the fact saddam threatened to start up merchandising his oil in EURO's particularly of the dollar, and usa cant print euro's!!
2016-12-15 11:13:21 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The same guys who allegedly brought down the Twin Towers single-handedly? Come on, let's get past the whole conspiracy thing, shall we? How can anyone defend a madman like Saddam?
2006-12-29 14:22:03 · answer #4 · answered by AK 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
right you are bro....FOLLOW THE MONEY! payoffs, bribes, oil for food, would show corruption in the USA by these so called leaders....oil companies, halburtion etc
2006-12-29 14:27:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who the heck cares? the SOB is gone.
2006-12-29 14:20:12 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
old news and new news-saddam is dead
2006-12-29 14:28:01 · answer #7 · answered by cork 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
God will be his judge now.
2006-12-29 14:19:28 · answer #8 · answered by glasgow girl 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋