As example of this is as follows: You are given a choice between box A and Box B. The 2 boxes, however, contain identical things. It may appear on the surface that you have a choice, but in reality, there is only one possible outcome, forced to that no matter what you do. At times, I feel this to the be the situation in United States, where whether you vote for the Democrats or Republicans, the result will be the same.
2006-12-29 14:05:35 · 10 answers · asked by Thomas 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
dammed if you do and dammed if you don't
2006-12-29 14:16:31 · answer #1 · answered by T.K. 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dilemma: A bull is charging at you from one end of a narrow corridor, the other end of which is blocked. You have the option of being gored by the left horn, or being gored by the right horn.
In logic:
B = D
A or C
If A, then B
If C, then D
In reference to voting for the Democrats or the Republicans, there is such a vast possible range of results that the most unreasonable resolutions to questions tend to be the first to be tossed aside. Of course, this is not guaranteed, since if one of those two parties gains too much power, I tend to think they will abuse it. So, regardless of the fact that whichever candidate you vote for, the results are often the same, the only conscientious thing to do is to vote for the one that best represents the way you think the nation, state, city, or whatever OUGHT TO BE GOVERNED. That way, no one can take your acquiescence to imply your consent.
2006-12-29 14:35:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
In reference to the voting, I like the way a comedian once said it:
You walk onto a car lot and ask to see the corvette. The salesman takes you and shows you two vehicles - A septic tank recovery system, and a waste receptacle compression unit. He smiles at you and says, take your pick, this is all I have to offer.
Problem is, they look different, they sound different, they do different things, but they are both full of garbage
2006-12-29 14:18:48 · answer #3 · answered by I think, therefore I broke it? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i might want to bypass with decision "B". i idea that Sheamus prevailing change into an impressive decision. I comprehend that Chris Jericho is a very conventional wrestler, and that i'm a huge fan of him myself, yet i don't believe of each person can objectively say that he "deserved" it any more suitable than Sheamus. it truly is merely me talking from an independent attitude, yet Jericho hasn't wrestled a unmarried journey in on the point of two years. in the intervening time, Sheamus has been breaking his way up by the cardboard and excelling each step of ways. he's been good on the cusp of turning right into a member of adult men like John Cena, CM Punk and Randy Orton as between the elite stars of the WWE, and tonight change into the perfect chance to improve that. even as the journey itself wasn't my all time fashionable or something, i change into extremely happy Sheamus received. i imagine this may extremely vault him into that top echelon type with those different names i discussed. Plus, i imagine this extremely enables set the degree for an action-packed Wrestlemania. We have already got John Cena vs. The Rock set and scheduled, yet now Sheamus, CM Punk, Kane, Chris Jericho and in all likelihood Triple H and The Undertaker all have plenty going for them at present. i'm not particular yet how they are going to all shake down, inspite of the indisputable fact that it truly is going to be strong one way or yet another. i love Jericho, and had he received i does not were disillusioned, yet i extremely desire Sheamus. He mandatory this one, and both from his own occupation standpoint and the lengthy-time period benifits to the WWE as an complete, he change into the right guy on the right time tonight.
2016-12-01 07:54:19 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Catch 22... as in the novel.
"Among other things, Catch-22 is a general critique of bureaucratic operation and reasoning. Resulting from its specific use in the book, the phrase "Catch-22" is common idiomatic usage meaning "a no-win situation" or "a double bind" of any type."
2006-12-29 14:09:41 · answer #5 · answered by misskate12001 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That is very true my brother. No matter what, the profesies of the Bible will come to pass and we all have the decision to chose our Creator God in the end by not recieving the Mark of the Beast (RFID microchip). So don't worry about who is chosen. If you follow the Lord he will be your rock when hard times come. For the end is near now and you will see very soon what I mean. However, don't take my word for it take His Word. Study the Book of Revelations in the Holy Bible.
2006-12-29 14:24:16 · answer #6 · answered by Rabbit's Girl 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
It's either a no-win situation or a win-win situation.
2006-12-29 14:10:07 · answer #7 · answered by Lilith Phoenix 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Please forgive me for being crude, but it is called "farting in a windstorm."
Also, it is what most if life is - we have so little control over what others do, and the choices we are faced with in life.
2006-12-31 07:27:06 · answer #8 · answered by Tanya D 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would call that predestination.
2006-12-29 14:10:11 · answer #9 · answered by Meg M 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
lose-lose situation
defeated
hopeless
conundrum***
2006-12-29 14:09:06 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋