Bush is the father of terrorists. Poor dope.....
I would add that if they hang Presidents for causing the deaths of thousands of people, then Mr. Bush is doomed........between not acting to prevent the 9-11 attacks, the botched "War on Terrorism" -- with a US death toll now exceeding the number of people killed in 9-11 --- AND the painstakingly poor response to Hurricane Katrina, Dubya has some owing up to do....if there's a rope wide enough to fit around that fat head of his.
2006-12-29 12:53:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
3⤋
Terrorist were already here before Bush went to war in Afghanistan and Irak. For instance Indonesia, France, Algeria...
But after the 9/11 terrorists are developping at an very fast pace. And they wttacked countries that had been spared before : England ( London's transports bombing ), Spain train's attack, Reed ( the guy who had a bomb in his shoes during a France - Miami flight...
Bush claimed the world was safer. I really doubt it. If it was safer then there would have been the attemps to gaz plain, there would be so many dead US soldiers and citiwen everyday in Irak.
It was your right to defend yourself but the way it happen in Irak was wrong.
2006-12-29 13:20:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by kl55000 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
The hatred and desire to strike out against the "evils" of Western society was there long before Bush took office. Zealots have claimed for a long time now that the West is evil and beyond redemption. They teach young children that we are cruel torturers, unjust,selfish, and that it is thier duty to stop us by any means.
Bush's war in Iraq has given much more wieght to thier words, and I think has helped to create far more terrorists than have been captured or killed.
2006-12-29 13:16:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by Quibish 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Breeding is the wrong word, and the situation cannot be blamed on one man alone. But yes, I do think that the current decisions that we are making will spell trouble for the future.
When three buildings fell in New York, an entire nation called for vengeance. (well, most of a nation) How many buildings have fallen in Iraq? I fear we may have opened a Pandora's box.
2006-12-29 12:56:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by joecool123_us 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
When 9/11 happened the vast majority of the people on the planet were in America's corner. They sympathized deeply with the shock and heartache Americans were experiencing, and many of us felt the same threat to our countries that Americans felt to theirs. The world changed that day, for many of us.
Bush changed that. He wasted all that good will when he decided to use 9/11 as an opportunity to service corporate greed. When he sent the military in to kill hundreds of thousands of innocent people for the sake of oil, he turned his back on the support the rest of the world was ready to give America.
I don't think America has been written off, but the world wants to see Bush and his cronies held to account, and they want to see someone of integrity come to the Oval Office.
2006-12-29 13:02:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
No, Bush is not breeding terrorists, he is killing them so they can't attack America again.
People should know that the sick person who asked this question accused me of being a child molester and said he would have me put on the sex offender registry because I challenged his lies. I hope he follows through on his threats so I can sue him for defamation of character and slander.
2006-12-30 01:03:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by jesuscuresislam 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
sure, yet like a stable Neo-Con or as maximum genuine conservatives decide directly to call him a stable liberal, President Bush is aborting the terrorists that are being bred. he's killing them off like planned Parenthood kills the youngsters of the promiscuous. Democrats in no way decide directly to confess that because of the fact the Wilson administration that they like to get our united states into wars to deliver peace or freedom or democracy to something of the worldwide. Then cry relating to the casualties. look at all of the bleeding hearts that decide directly to "restoration" Darfur. the only thank you to restoration Darfur would be to go there and start up up killing the Islamic militiamen. we could start up annoying approximately genuine protection of this united states and produce our militia returned to shelter our borders and root out all of the sleeper cells that have been infiltrating us when you consider that Teddy Kennedy comfortable immigration standards returned in the Nineteen Sixties
2016-12-15 11:06:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Islamic terrorists' threats, demands and tactics are very clear. Anyone who opposes them and stands up to their terror will most certainly "breed" more of them. It is, after all, a war.
And, in my opinion, this is a good thing - bring the psycho cowards out into the open instead of allowing them the time to fabricate new shrapnel stuffed bomb vests so they can detonate them in crowded malls, weddings and other places where there are crowds of innocent men, women and children.
As far as the rest of the world - maybe you believe we should follow France or Spain's example? The terrorists would certainly appreciate a little passive support for their agenda.
2006-12-29 13:00:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by LeAnne 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Before Dubbya, terrorism in Iraq did not exist. Now people from all over the region are volunteering to go to Iraq and fight us. Bush calls all of them terrorists; that is anyone who opposes his agenda for the Middle East. Now Iraq is called a breeding ground for terror by Bush and his staff of World Dominionists. When you bomb people they tend to get mad at you and fight back. When you pit people against each other, as the Bush family has done in Iraq since the 1980's, they tend to fight more. We did not cause all the divisions in Iraq, but we have made every one of them worse, and every day longer we stay there the situation will deteriorate unless we radically change what we are doing there. Bush/Cheney have no intentions of changing what they are doing, so we can expect the problem to continue to go down hill.
2006-12-29 12:58:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by michaelsan 6
·
5⤊
2⤋
Yes, the rest of the world seems to resent America's current foreign policy. Bush has sent us into a war, even though the UN was opposed to it, and he doesn't seem to want help from any other countries. It seems like he thinks America is a "lone ranger."
2006-12-29 12:55:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by greencoke 5
·
1⤊
1⤋