It is already melting. But i think it will stop doing it around 2015, because according with russians scientists from that year on, will begin a "global freezing". In the beggining will be very little, but in 2050 will be very hard. That is because of sun's waves. But after a few hundred years, will be a global warming again.
2006-12-29 12:55:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Entrada de datos 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
THERE IS NO GLOBAL WARMING!
Now that that is said, here is the real reason a 25 mile piece broke off. Water is constantly freezing up there. And yes, it is melting too. When water freezes - it expands. Pressure builds up and sooner or later, something's gotta give. In this case, a 25 mile piece.
They always say "Global Warming". Could it not be that the Ice Age is still in melt down? That it isn't over yet? Temperature records have only been kept for about 100 years now. It took millions of years to freeze and then thaw.
I guess these meteorologists and scientists need something to play with. Every theory starts with a null-hypothesis, in this case it is the earth is warming up. A statement known to be false but used as a basis for further study - a starting point.
Take it from there.
2006-12-29 13:02:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by Newt 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
In 1925, based upon the Sector Principle, Canada became the first country to extend its boundaries northward to the North Pole, at least on paper, between 60°W and 141°W longitude, a claim that is not universally recognized (there is in fact 770 km of ocean between the Pole and Canada's northernmost land point). In addition, Canada claims the water between its Arctic Islands as internal waters. Denmark (Greenland), Russia and Norway have made similar claims.
Otherwise, until 1999, the North Pole and Arctic Ocean had been generally considered international territory. However, as the polar ice has begun to recede at a rate higher than expected (see global warming), several countries have made moves to claim, or to enforce pre-existing claims to, the waters or seabed at the Pole. Russia made its first claim in 2001, claiming Lomonosov Ridge, an underwater mountain ridge underneath the Pole, as a natural extension of Siberia. This claim was contested by Norway, Canada, the United States and Denmark in 2004. The Danish autonomous province of Greenland has the nearest coastline to the North Pole, and Denmark argues that the Lomonosov Ridge is in fact an extension of Greenland.
The potential value of the North Pole and the surrounding area resides not so much in shipping but in the possibility that lucrative petroleum and natural gas reserves exist below the sea floor. Such reserves are known to exist under the Beaufort Sea, and further exploration elsewhere in the Arctic might become more feasible if global warming opens up the Northwest Passage as a regular channel of international shipping and commerce, particularly if Canada is not able to enforce its claim to it.
2006-12-29 12:51:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by Al Kaholic 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
It already IS melting at the north and south poles because of global warming. Have you seen Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth"? It's a good place to start if you are learning about the subject.
2006-12-29 12:53:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by p_i_turtle_sanders 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
It is already melting. Polar bears are drowning at an alarming rate. 25% of their population is is gone due to drowning deaths because their Arctic habitat is melting away. It is estimated that the Arctic ice will be completely melted by 2040. That's not that far away. That is in many of our lifetimes. If you were born in the late 70's or in the 80's. You will be in your 50's or 60's when that happens. So, that's not that far away.
2006-12-29 12:54:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by OranjTulip 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
first off there isn't any real global warming as it's called by scientists. The earth merely heats up and cools down. (Hence the ice ages ending before we were around to "cause global warming") I doubt the ice that far north will melt before the earth goes through another cooling period.
2006-12-29 12:51:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by pzratnog 3
·
2⤊
3⤋
It is melting little by little it is ice and when ever a little heat get to ice it will melt dont worry what is to be will be.
2006-12-29 12:53:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by maria fkun 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
you're thoroughly correct, floating ice does not reason any upward push in sea aspect at the same time as it melts for the excuses you state. human beings that say that the floating ice above the water aspect motives sea aspect to upward push at the same time as it melts are incorrect. that's because as you state "a body floating in a liquid displaces a quantity of liquid equivalent to the burden of the floating body". that's something that receives drummed into students interpreting this at college aspect! regardless of the indisputable fact that as different individuals have referred to there is countless land ice interior the Arctic, specially the Greenland ice cap. As that's land-depending ice that's going to reason sea aspect upward push at the same time as it enters the sea. yet another ingredient is that as international temperatures advance sea water expands (basically as air expands at the same time as it receives hotter). This also motives sea aspect to upward push. And on a correct note, ice is amazingly reflective, standard as having a severe albedo. this suggests it reflects a severe share of the incoming image voltaic radiation decrease back into area. because the ice melts it exhibits both rock or sea which both have a decrease albedo meaning they mirror a lot less of the suns radiation, therefore absorbing more desirable. that's then released and heats the ambience, causing air temperatures to upward push extra, which motives more desirable ice to soften, which exposes more desirable rock or sea, which motives more desirable image voltaic radiation to warmth the ambience... etc. there is countless very complicated feedbacks interior the elements device and we do not comprehend all of them! desire this helps, you're spot on mutually with your physics.
2016-10-16 22:22:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by kenton 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The US and Canada are already sparring about who will have the right to charge for shipping passage through this new year-round water-way.
2006-12-29 12:53:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by HomeSweetSiliconValley 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
If we continue down our globally reckless course then the caps will melt. Hopefully we will change paths before it is too late.
2006-12-29 12:51:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by fade_this_rally 7
·
0⤊
3⤋